Pink Kate
#471
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Just 'my' opinion....
>
> Mine too.
>
> I caught a ration of crap today from a friend whom I had
> just told I had
> caught a rattlesnake from under our front deck and hauled
> it off and let
> it go a couple of miles from my house. "You didn't KILL
> it!?!" Why
> should I? It has it's place in the world.
>
> I only kill 'em when I can't possibly remove it from where
> it is.
>
> First rattler I've seen this year, 5 footer, beautiful
> specimen, could
> have been fresh skin it was so vivid in color.
>
> No bears here, but this weekend I'll be in bear country on
> the Rio
> Grande out near Sanderson, Texas.
My Grandparents went to extraordinary lengths to kill
rattlers, if they couldn't run over them with a vehicle
they'd stop and grab whatever was handy, generally
construction tools. I saw Joe pound the crap outta one, on
a dirt shoulder, with a sledge hammer. That was an epic
battle. My Grandma damn near ran the Ford off into the San
Fernando valley another time, but she eventually mashed the
bugger. He had about 8 rattles in his junk drawer and one
very nice hat-band!
Seahag
#472
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Just 'my' opinion....
>
> Mine too.
>
> I caught a ration of crap today from a friend whom I had
> just told I had
> caught a rattlesnake from under our front deck and hauled
> it off and let
> it go a couple of miles from my house. "You didn't KILL
> it!?!" Why
> should I? It has it's place in the world.
>
> I only kill 'em when I can't possibly remove it from where
> it is.
>
> First rattler I've seen this year, 5 footer, beautiful
> specimen, could
> have been fresh skin it was so vivid in color.
>
> No bears here, but this weekend I'll be in bear country on
> the Rio
> Grande out near Sanderson, Texas.
My Grandparents went to extraordinary lengths to kill
rattlers, if they couldn't run over them with a vehicle
they'd stop and grab whatever was handy, generally
construction tools. I saw Joe pound the crap outta one, on
a dirt shoulder, with a sledge hammer. That was an epic
battle. My Grandma damn near ran the Ford off into the San
Fernando valley another time, but she eventually mashed the
bugger. He had about 8 rattles in his junk drawer and one
very nice hat-band!
Seahag
#473
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Just 'my' opinion....
>
> Mine too.
>
> I caught a ration of crap today from a friend whom I had
> just told I had
> caught a rattlesnake from under our front deck and hauled
> it off and let
> it go a couple of miles from my house. "You didn't KILL
> it!?!" Why
> should I? It has it's place in the world.
>
> I only kill 'em when I can't possibly remove it from where
> it is.
>
> First rattler I've seen this year, 5 footer, beautiful
> specimen, could
> have been fresh skin it was so vivid in color.
>
> No bears here, but this weekend I'll be in bear country on
> the Rio
> Grande out near Sanderson, Texas.
My Grandparents went to extraordinary lengths to kill
rattlers, if they couldn't run over them with a vehicle
they'd stop and grab whatever was handy, generally
construction tools. I saw Joe pound the crap outta one, on
a dirt shoulder, with a sledge hammer. That was an epic
battle. My Grandma damn near ran the Ford off into the San
Fernando valley another time, but she eventually mashed the
bugger. He had about 8 rattles in his junk drawer and one
very nice hat-band!
Seahag
#474
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nathan will deny it now. Notice how he back-pedaled on the wolf killing
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
#475
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nathan will deny it now. Notice how he back-pedaled on the wolf killing
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
#476
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nathan will deny it now. Notice how he back-pedaled on the wolf killing
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
issue.
Earle
"twaldron" <thomasOBVIOUS@rubicons.com> wrote in message
news:h2q2g.4723$Lm5.4701@newssvr12.news.prodigy.co m...
> I used to think of you as a level headed guy. The fact that you are
> posting that you condone abortion clinic bombings has quashed that. It
> is simple terrorism and is no different that what Al Qaeda is doing.
> People who help and support terrorism are no better than the ones
> pushing the buttons.
>
> tw
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>
> >>Blowing up an abortion clinic is insane.
> >
> >
> > as is pulling a baby half out of the mothers womb before scrambling its
> > brains just before running down to protest the execution of tookie
williams.
> > kill the baby, save the convicted killer......_thats_ insane.
> >
#477
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
#478
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
#479
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
news:qWi2g.105$2i5.14229@news.uswest.net...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oji2g.20150$ZB1.10341@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Yep, a lot of people are not very consistent in their beliefs... I
believe
> > in pre-natal abortion AND post-natal abortion... I'm consistent...
>
> i just dont understand how anyone can kill a child.
>
A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
understand how anyone could kill them.
No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
don't have a legal leg to stand on.
This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
"right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
probably not good enough.
Earle
#480
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>> Having been bitten "accidentally" by a German Shepherd
>> that knew me well, I
>> still have to agree with you. They can freak out, if
>> they are not trained
>> properly, when they are put in a situation that they
>> can't handle, but that
>> is hardly their fault. I wouldn't have one, because I
>> wouldn't have the
>> patience for it, but more power to those who do.
>
>
> A dog will do exactly as he has been conditioned to do, by
> training, or lack of it.
>
> I was bitten by one of my canines, but it was entirely my
> fault.
>
> A drill will bore a hole right through your hand, just as
> it was designed to, if it isn't handled properly.
Yeah, and a paddle bit will make a hell of a mess!
Seahag