TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
>> Mike
>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
>> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to try that.
>
I would pull out the rocks from the tires first...
Mike
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Tracie wrote:
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
> SnoMan --
> You're right, I really don't have much knowledge of what causes
> pinging. I really do appreciate the fact that you're not being rude
> about it. I was just a little confused though when you said engines
> are more likely to ping at lower RPMs, then in the next paragraph, you
> said that higher RPMs would be all the more reason an engine would
> ping. Those statements contradict themselves (unless I am missing
> something that I don't quite understand).
>
> Any input regarding the 'rattlesnake noise'? It's just a soft
> 'purring' type noise. Not real loud at all, but does quit when I back
> off the accelerator just a touch.
>
He wasn't referring to you Tracie, Snoman prefers to criticize Mike
Romain than add anything original himself. As Mike said, I can't see how
your engine would be pinging at 2500 rpm.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Well then drop a gear or have pre-ignition detonation damage:
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Well then drop a gear or have pre-ignition detonation damage:
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TO PING OR NOT TO PING?
Well then drop a gear or have pre-ignition detonation damage:
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
http://www.ultralightnews.com/hirth/readingpistons.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Tracie" <brainart@upstate.edu> wrote in message
news:1190722865.360907.284350@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Chris --
>
> I think this is what I am hearing then. I paid special attention this
> morning on my commute to work, and this is what I noticed:
>
> In 5th gear going 60 mph at approximately 2200 RPMs, that noise is
> there but it is very quiet. The faster I go, the louder it gets. It
> never gets REALLY loud, just more noticeable. And the sound is steady
> and rhythmic. Not intermittent at all. When I let off the
> accelerator at say 65 mph, it gets quieter and quieter until speed is
> around 60 mph. Then it's just hardly noticeable. When I speed back
> up to 65 mph, same result. This noise steadily gets louder until it's
> more noticeable.
>
> Doug --
> Thanks for that tip. I'll check the distributor when I get out of
> work today just as a precaution. I doubt that's it, but you never
> know. I'll take any advice I can get (as long as it's within
> reason : D).
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
