OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
#271
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Stack has a good point. Maybe only military personnel should pay taxes, then
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
#272
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Stack has a good point. Maybe only military personnel should pay taxes, then
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
#273
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Stack has a good point. Maybe only military personnel should pay taxes, then
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
no one but them can say how their taxes are spent.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411BCD5D.A4CB63E5@***.net...
> Maybe, if you had raised your hand and sore and oath to defend your
> country, you would understand.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Sleestak wrote:
> >
> > Many people who you consider dead weight/freeloaders work hard and pay
taxes
> > which pays for the military. Those people have a right to say how their
> > tax money is spent.
#274
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
My parents were the first ------' listed in the San Diego phone
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
#275
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
My parents were the first ------' listed in the San Diego phone
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
#276
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
My parents were the first ------' listed in the San Diego phone
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
#277
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
My parents were the first ------' listed in the San Diego phone
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
book, I have always been listed. I becoming a member of Prodigy back in
'86, which used only member numbers, (ppwh98a@prodigy.com) but I quickly
associated it with my name. Adding an AOL B------III primary in '90,
soon after that they began Internet access (----------@prodigy.net)
although I stayed on our own bulletin boards. I added billhughe@Home.com
Cable Internet access in '96, but stayed within their own Usenet groups,
but upon their demise three years ago and I was switched to
----------@***.net, and ventured onto this group, and I dropped Prodigy.
Anyway, no one has ever bother me. I did take steps to freeze my credit
to guard against identity theft:
http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/le...ransunion.html
Anyway, be a man, take responsibility, unless that is a physical
impossible.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Sleestak wrote:
>
> Bill, I don't post my personal information on the internet -- there are too
> many wackos who are looking for that kind of information. If you want I
> will send you a personal email with my contact information. I'm not trying
> to fight with anyone on this board, and I did not start this thread. Plus
> I don't think I've said anything particulary controversal.
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
#278
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Not to impune the enormous sacrifice our soldiers have made, but serving and
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>
#279
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Not to impune the enormous sacrifice our soldiers have made, but serving and
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>
#280
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Not to impune the enormous sacrifice our soldiers have made, but serving and
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>
protecting one's country means more than just military service. How about
domestic police? Firefighters? Those that provide the tools the military
uses? Those that house, feed, and care for the children of defense
contractor workers? Those that pay the bills for the military? Are they not
serving their country?
I notice in your post you implied you stood on the wall in defense of the
GOVERNMENT, as opposed to our COUNTRY. Do you not see a distinction between
the two? Would you accept that even though one of the jobs of government is
to protect the country, often the country needs protection from its
government, (hence the Bill of Rights, et. al.)?
Of course the vast majority respect and admire those that stand on the wall,
who put themselves there at the request of their government. That some in
this country take issue with the *why* and *where* our soldiers are on the
wall isn't indicative of a lack of appreciation of their sacrifice, but more
of a difference of opinion from those that put them there in the first
place.
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10hnjthpaf3o258@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Josh" <SPAMjdunning@cadd-tech.com> wrote in message
> news:zwPSc.3097$FV3.684@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >
> > "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:10hnf8ko5597d01@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> > > news:fs8lh0phn9cla2jrvrojlr46rddmb5voro@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> > > > <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is
just
> > > > >that, a CHOICE.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, it is a responsibility.
> >
> > Actually, in America, it's still a choice.
> >
> >
>
> It's only a choice because that is how you see it. It's a responsibility.
> The choice is to accept or reject the responsibility. Trust me, you would
> have an entirely different view on just how shitty our government is if
you
> stood the wall in defense of it first.
>
>