|
Re: Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the Stalker!
On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote: >Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >sitting right below the light box. Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for safety codes. > >The light box is a 120V unit with the spin motor running on line voltage >and a stepdown transformer to give the 'light' only 12 or 24 volts. There is a difference between a motor that delevopes no voltage output and transformered curcuit. Maybe everyone else that designs this stuff and their safty codes is full of it and you should take over for them huh? > >Now once again go screw yourself! If is so much fun to watch you screw yourself MIke. You are your own worst enemy sometimes. > >Internet Stalkers are not cool these days as mentioned before or 'Why >Lord can't I at least get a halfway intelligent stalker not some brain >dead -------'???? Again it is funny to watch your comments sometimes as you act like a child > >Mike >86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Typical ego signature and serves no purpose other than to try to feed ego. BTW you left of your 5 speed with 4 usable gears because of your tall ratio "power" gears you use with big tires. (I guess this is why you got in a bit of a twist over low range usage a while back becaause you have never had a properly geared 4x4 that did not require frequent use of it and just could not understand why anyone would not need to use it often like you have too.) ----------------- TheSnoMan.com |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the lying Stalker!
SnoMan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >> a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >> sitting right below the light box. > > Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code > and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe > smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and > changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do > it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for > safety codes. LIAR! The fiber optic light boxes have a full 120 volts going into them, there is 'no' building code that prohibits that at all. Yes, I 'do' know this for a fact, it is my job to know. Once again you have proven yourself a liar and a Stalking idiot just full of --------. And seeing as you 'do' want to play, how would you like me to do a collection of all your total -------- and life threatening advise and add 'that' to every one of your posts for ya. Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the lying Stalker!
SnoMan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >> a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >> sitting right below the light box. > > Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code > and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe > smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and > changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do > it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for > safety codes. LIAR! The fiber optic light boxes have a full 120 volts going into them, there is 'no' building code that prohibits that at all. Yes, I 'do' know this for a fact, it is my job to know. Once again you have proven yourself a liar and a Stalking idiot just full of --------. And seeing as you 'do' want to play, how would you like me to do a collection of all your total -------- and life threatening advise and add 'that' to every one of your posts for ya. Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the lying Stalker!
SnoMan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >> a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >> sitting right below the light box. > > Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code > and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe > smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and > changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do > it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for > safety codes. LIAR! The fiber optic light boxes have a full 120 volts going into them, there is 'no' building code that prohibits that at all. Yes, I 'do' know this for a fact, it is my job to know. Once again you have proven yourself a liar and a Stalking idiot just full of --------. And seeing as you 'do' want to play, how would you like me to do a collection of all your total -------- and life threatening advise and add 'that' to every one of your posts for ya. Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the lying Stalker!
SnoMan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >> a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >> sitting right below the light box. > > Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code > and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe > smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and > changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do > it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for > safety codes. LIAR! The fiber optic light boxes have a full 120 volts going into them, there is 'no' building code that prohibits that at all. Yes, I 'do' know this for a fact, it is my job to know. Once again you have proven yourself a liar and a Stalking idiot just full of --------. And seeing as you 'do' want to play, how would you like me to do a collection of all your total -------- and life threatening advise and add 'that' to every one of your posts for ya. Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Jeff Strickland wrote:
[snip] > > Where I got sideways is that the filiment LOOKS okay, so I checked it with my > meter and it checked good too. As I explained in another post, I either > operated my meter wrong, or it's broken. (I'm inclined to go with "wrong" for > now. Don't ask ... ) This has happened to me and I work with lights for a living. Here's what could have happened: The filament broke near the connection point. When you put your meter on it the fliament flopped back into place and the meter showed continuity. When you put it back into the socket it didn't work -- either because the motion opened up the gap again or because the heat generated when you aplied voltage expanded the metal and opened up the gap. It tests OK, your meter works, but the bulb is bad. I've even seen sparks jumping across the gap wen you apply power to globes like that. A related error can happen with cartridge fuses -- they can blow and still carry the milliamp or so of current that the meter puts out, so they test OK. But there's not enough conducting material there to carry real current and under load you have an open circuit. -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast. |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Jeff Strickland wrote:
[snip] > > Where I got sideways is that the filiment LOOKS okay, so I checked it with my > meter and it checked good too. As I explained in another post, I either > operated my meter wrong, or it's broken. (I'm inclined to go with "wrong" for > now. Don't ask ... ) This has happened to me and I work with lights for a living. Here's what could have happened: The filament broke near the connection point. When you put your meter on it the fliament flopped back into place and the meter showed continuity. When you put it back into the socket it didn't work -- either because the motion opened up the gap again or because the heat generated when you aplied voltage expanded the metal and opened up the gap. It tests OK, your meter works, but the bulb is bad. I've even seen sparks jumping across the gap wen you apply power to globes like that. A related error can happen with cartridge fuses -- they can blow and still carry the milliamp or so of current that the meter puts out, so they test OK. But there's not enough conducting material there to carry real current and under load you have an open circuit. -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast. |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Jeff Strickland wrote:
[snip] > > Where I got sideways is that the filiment LOOKS okay, so I checked it with my > meter and it checked good too. As I explained in another post, I either > operated my meter wrong, or it's broken. (I'm inclined to go with "wrong" for > now. Don't ask ... ) This has happened to me and I work with lights for a living. Here's what could have happened: The filament broke near the connection point. When you put your meter on it the fliament flopped back into place and the meter showed continuity. When you put it back into the socket it didn't work -- either because the motion opened up the gap again or because the heat generated when you aplied voltage expanded the metal and opened up the gap. It tests OK, your meter works, but the bulb is bad. I've even seen sparks jumping across the gap wen you apply power to globes like that. A related error can happen with cartridge fuses -- they can blow and still carry the milliamp or so of current that the meter puts out, so they test OK. But there's not enough conducting material there to carry real current and under load you have an open circuit. -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast. |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Jeff Strickland wrote:
[snip] > > Where I got sideways is that the filiment LOOKS okay, so I checked it with my > meter and it checked good too. As I explained in another post, I either > operated my meter wrong, or it's broken. (I'm inclined to go with "wrong" for > now. Don't ask ... ) This has happened to me and I work with lights for a living. Here's what could have happened: The filament broke near the connection point. When you put your meter on it the fliament flopped back into place and the meter showed continuity. When you put it back into the socket it didn't work -- either because the motion opened up the gap again or because the heat generated when you aplied voltage expanded the metal and opened up the gap. It tests OK, your meter works, but the bulb is bad. I've even seen sparks jumping across the gap wen you apply power to globes like that. A related error can happen with cartridge fuses -- they can blow and still carry the milliamp or so of current that the meter puts out, so they test OK. But there's not enough conducting material there to carry real current and under load you have an open circuit. -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast. |
Re: ((OT)) Electronics (electrical) Problem = SnoMan the lying Stalker!
I'll say again, Bloman, ALL of my pool lighting is 120V, professionally
installed, passed inspection and conforms with code. No electrical code forbids full line voltage in wet areas or requires low-voltage circuits in wet areas instead of line voltage. If it did, my pool pumps would operate on 12 volts and require twenty times as much current as they do now, which would be very dangerous. Code provides for the wet areas by requiring GFCI's and conduit rated for wet areas. Time to re-join the real world and leave this fantasy world you live in where you are always right and anyone that disagrees with you is wrong. Yes, you are now in my killfile, but you are so spectacularly wrong on your assumption (that you present as fact) that code requires low-voltage wiring for pools, I had to respond. "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:465ed82f$0$10513$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... > SnoMan wrote: >> On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:30:45 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> Listen you insane lying brain dead stalker twerp, 'his' light box is in >>> a planter and the one I did is behind the 220 panel for the pool motors >>> sitting right below the light box. >> >> Such a child, I do not carr where bulb is. There is a reason for code >> and why there as codes for using lower voltages unless you get wannabe >> smart guys like you that decides that code does not mean squat and >> changes it. It is bad enough you do this to your own stuff but to do >> it to others and tell others to do it to show a real desrepect for >> safety codes. > > LIAR! > > The fiber optic light boxes have a full 120 volts going into them, there > is 'no' building code that prohibits that at all. Yes, I 'do' know this > for a fact, it is my job to know. > > Once again you have proven yourself a liar and a Stalking idiot just full > of --------. > > And seeing as you 'do' want to play, how would you like me to do a > collection of all your total -------- and life threatening advise and add > 'that' to every one of your posts for ya. > > Mike > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands