OT BioDiesel
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off. As
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off. As
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off. As
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their only purpose is
to sell another government grant.
Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
as it generates:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
someday.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> I always figured that making ethanol from corn and putting it in
> *cars* was a waste of good liquor... Corn liquor should be put in your
> *stomach*...
>
> Once we perfect nuclear *fusion*, we'll be doing great... We'll have
> enough extra energy to use that we can just produce hydrogen from
> water via electrolysis... Converting an internal combustion engine to
> run on hydrogen is not anywhere as complex as developing a fuel
> cell... Of course, we're trading the complexity of developing a fuel
> cell to the complexity of developing nuclear fusion... <grin>
>
> Of course, an added advantage of using hydrogen to power our cars is
> that terrorism would be reduced since without the money from oil, the
> Mid East would go back to being the *poor* camel ----in' Bedoins that
> they have been throughout most of their history...
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
"another" It's like money in the bank, only appreciating like
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
"another" It's like money in the bank, only appreciating like
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
"another" It's like money in the bank, only appreciating like
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
crazy. ;-)
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Only a thousand rounds? Hell, that's only good for a couple hours of
> plinking...
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
On Tue, 09 May 2006 00:00:27 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
On Tue, 09 May 2006 00:00:27 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
On Tue, 09 May 2006 00:00:27 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You have to obtain the temperature of the Sun to pull that off.
Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
> As soon as someone says cold fusion turn them off as their
> only purpose is to sell another government grant.
Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
> Hydrogen is another fuel that take six times the energy to produce
> as it generates:
> http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/chemis...ctrolysis.html But maybe
> someday.
Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
dyno juice...
And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT BioDiesel
In our sabre rattling we are about to open a nuclear test site in
Utah next month, the seven hundred ton is designed to leak a mushroom
cloud, but not radioactive, sure:
http://www.suujournal.com/vnews/disp.../44506c8fc8fd6
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
> occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
>
> Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
> 'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
>
> Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
> electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
> Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
> though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
> dyno juice...
>
> And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...
Utah next month, the seven hundred ton is designed to leak a mushroom
cloud, but not radioactive, sure:
http://www.suujournal.com/vnews/disp.../44506c8fc8fd6
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Grumman-581 wrote:
>
> Yeah, we've perfected it, but only as a weapon... Minor inconveniences
> occur when it is not "contained"... <evil-grin>
>
> Nope, I was talking about *real* fusion, not the snake oil research of
> 'cold' fusion... If it was easy, we would already have it, right?
>
> Yeah, electrolysis is not efficient, but with a cheap enough
> electrical energy source available, it might still be acceptable...
> Maybe more efficient photovoltic array or fusion might give us this
> though... I'm not holding my breath though... Until then, I'm burning
> dyno juice...
>
> And maybe bio-diesel in any diesel that I might own...