Oil prices got you down?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Matt?????????????
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Matt?????????????
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Matt?????????????
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Matt?????????????
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Bleeding heart liberals have such short memories. I guess you
completely forgot the reason we stomped Iraq over their Kuwait invasion
in '91?????????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The Greatest Generation recognized that Germany and Japan actually *were*
> taking over the world. Hussien just talked about it, never actually tried,
> the Iran war notwithstanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil prices got you down?
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Its good having you back, Earle :-)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
