Oil prices got you down?
Guest
Posts: n/a
This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's
****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember, they
did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of another
kind of bureaucracy.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:ce517$42ff8ad3$453deea8$25919@FUSE.NET...
> > People forget, that the 911 skyjackers did not target New York City or
the
> > World Trade Center, so much as the bureaucrats housed within.
>
> And where do you get this information from? Your ****? As far as I know,
> they targeted the Trade Center because of it's international symbolism. It
> had much more impact than running a 747 into the Sears Tower.
>
>
****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember, they
did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of another
kind of bureaucracy.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:ce517$42ff8ad3$453deea8$25919@FUSE.NET...
> > People forget, that the 911 skyjackers did not target New York City or
the
> > World Trade Center, so much as the bureaucrats housed within.
>
> And where do you get this information from? Your ****? As far as I know,
> they targeted the Trade Center because of it's international symbolism. It
> had much more impact than running a 747 into the Sears Tower.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's
> ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> they
> did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> another
> kind of bureaucracy.
No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's
> ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> they
> did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> another
> kind of bureaucracy.
No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's
> ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> they
> did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> another
> kind of bureaucracy.
No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from one's
> ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> they
> did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> another
> kind of bureaucracy.
No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's not about Muslims vs. non-Muslims. It's all about business. I am not
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>
making anything up. A number of writers and political scientists, who know
a lot more than I do, subscribe to this theory. "Aquí no existe más que
pura conveniencia y puro interés" (Elena Poniatowska, Hasta no verte Jesús
mio, Ediciones Era, 2004, p. 218) and "El mundo requiere un nuevo contrato
internacional entre Estados al servicio de los pueblos" (Carlos Fuentes,
Contra Bush, Aguilar, 2004, p. 71) Our military might serves to protect our
bureaucracy, more than our people or even our business interests.
It's too bad, that it is "our government's military might" rather than
"ours". :o)
Earle
"Ruel Smith" <NoWay@NoWhere.com> wrote in message
news:28c80$42ff8f18$453deea8$8821@FUSE.NET...
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1124044101.cddf3162fc3c8844b66ebac5c0a9af81@t eranews...
> > This is opinion, much like your opinion. Not all opinion comes from
one's
> > ****, as yours does. What do you think "international symbolism" is a
> > symbol of, and who do you think worked in the trade towers? Remember,
> > they
> > did attack the Pentagram too, but that is an international symbol of
> > another
> > kind of bureaucracy.
>
> No, the Pentegon is a symbol of our military might. The Trade Center also
> employed Muslims too. I think you're making it all up.
>
>


