new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
On 24 Nov 2003 12:02 PM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
On 24 Nov 2003 12:02 PM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
On 24 Nov 2003 12:02 PM, L.W.(?ill) ------ III posted the following:
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Perhaps, you already have auxiliary saddle tanks added, did they
> do a good job cutting through the fender, or did they take the easy
> way and you have to slide the pump past the wheel into the well?
My dad bought the '73 new, so I know exactly what has been done. The
passenger side tank was the stock original tank, and dad added the
driver's side auxiliary tank sometime later on, but he used the factory
type tank (the tanks are the same part for either side). The right hand
tank has the original filler cap in the original location on a fender
that was new about 15 years ago. The other fender I replaced during the
rebuild 3 years ago, but GM doesn't make the original style for just a
cap anymore, so I got the later style with a door. So I have a fuel
door on one side, and a cap on the other. So far nobody has noticed
unless it is pointed out to them. 8^)
If I build another auxiliary I haven't decided what to do for the filler
yet, but it isn't going to be something hacked together. For fuel feed,
I'l probably use a little transfer pump to dump it into one of the other
tanks.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Morgan frames will never rust:
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Morgan frames will never rust:
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Morgan frames will never rust:
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/morganspecialists.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> OK, what about British steel? Wondering how it could ever
> rust with the constant coating of motor oil, transmission
> oil, etc. supplied by the wooden main seals.
>
> Some of the Porsche bodies were so bad the joke amongst
> owners was that on a quiet night you could actually hear
> them corrode.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Approximately 11/24/03 23:47, L.W.(ßill) ------ III uttered for posterity:
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Approximately 11/24/03 23:47, L.W.(ßill) ------ III uttered for posterity:
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Approximately 11/24/03 23:47, L.W.(ßill) ------ III uttered for posterity:
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
> Morgan frames will never rust:
True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
2 years to get rid of the termites.
Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
series Morgan.
--
Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new jeep - mastershield undercoat
Hi Lon,
The one I'm familiar with was a new '65 at the time I was station
with it's owner in Germany. And the front end suspension was bolted to
what looked like 2X4s I look long and hard for it on the internet but
all I could find was what the shell was nailed to without what the
springs would be bolted to:
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/images/frame2.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> Approximately 11/24/03 23:47, L.W.(ßill) ------ III uttered for posterity:
>
> > Morgan frames will never rust:
>
> True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
> 2 years to get rid of the termites.
>
> Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
> series Morgan.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
The one I'm familiar with was a new '65 at the time I was station
with it's owner in Germany. And the front end suspension was bolted to
what looked like 2X4s I look long and hard for it on the internet but
all I could find was what the shell was nailed to without what the
springs would be bolted to:
http://www.harpers-morgan.com/images/frame2.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> Approximately 11/24/03 23:47, L.W.(ßill) ------ III uttered for posterity:
>
> > Morgan frames will never rust:
>
> True, but you need to take them to a good exterminator every
> 2 years to get rid of the termites.
>
> Honestly don't recall any wood body parts in the new Aero8
> series Morgan.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.
