The new GC with Hemi
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
> Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Too freakin' funny!
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Too freakin' funny!
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Too freakin' funny!
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Mike
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Is that the same type of abortion GM gave up on years ago?
> > The stupid 8, 6, 4 cylinder engine?
>
> FYI, here's a good description of the MDS system here:
>
> http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
>
> Please note that I'm not passing judgement on it -- at least not yet...
>
> -John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
> Too freakin' funny!
>
> It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
>
> So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
about their longevity...
-John
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The new GC with Hemi
John Sevey wrote:
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Too freakin' funny!
> >
> > It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> > faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
> >
> > So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> > and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> > this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
>
> Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
> system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
>
> http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
>
> Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
> miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
> about their longevity...
>
> -John
You are right time will tell, but they don't sound like they are
starting out well.
Mike
>
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Too freakin' funny!
> >
> > It 'should' be better than the GM abortion because 'electronics are
> > faster' and the mathematicians are better. LOL!!!
> >
> > So you get all this expensive 'extra' electronics, parts and hesitations
> > and all the rest of the crap in an 'experimental' engine to gain , wait,
> > this is good... a whopping 3 mpg!!!!!!!
>
> Here's another article, showing that good 'ol GM is also using the same
> system. This article also mentions a similar "computing power" quote:
>
> http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/041020.htm
>
> Like I said, I'll wait 'till some of these things get more actual consumer
> miles on them before I pass judgement on them, but I have my own concerns
> about their longevity...
>
> -John
You are right time will tell, but they don't sound like they are
starting out well.
Mike