Much difference between 30's and 31's?
03-02-2004, 03:26 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <40444C13.65A28DFA@***.net> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 03:26 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <40444C13.65A28DFA@***.net> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 03:26 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <40444C13.65A28DFA@***.net> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> Hi Jeff,
> Not in my book, 30" are still taller than what came with four
> cylinder and your gearing.
Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 03:31 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <g2m8405fdc7f4khjmghcdvtkah40sb2q31@4ax.com> David C. Moller wrote:
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 03:31 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <g2m8405fdc7f4khjmghcdvtkah40sb2q31@4ax.com> David C. Moller wrote:
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 03:31 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
In <g2m8405fdc7f4khjmghcdvtkah40sb2q31@4ax.com> David C. Moller wrote:
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
> With only 12K on your current BFG AT's, no way would I be looking to
> move to 31's. You're only talking about an extra half inch of
> clearance (then again, having *no* dent in your oil pan is better than
> having a half an inch dent, if you know what I mean hehehe). Maybe if
> you could get a buyer lined up for your AT's at a decent price it
> would be worth the switch.
It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
good all around combination.
Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
answer for him.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 05:03 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
Yup, that's Jeff told us. And what do all four cylinders come with?
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 05:03 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
Yup, that's Jeff told us. And what do all four cylinders come with?
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 05:03 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
Yup, that's Jeff told us. And what do all four cylinders come with?
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
You want Jeff to throw away his 30" BFG tires after only having a
quarter use of them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> Bill, his Jeep came with 3.07 gearing so it can't be a 4 cylinder. He
> regeared it to 4.1 according to his post. I think the 31s will be a
> better match for his gearing, although 32s would probably be even better.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
03-02-2004, 05:06 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Much difference between 30's and 31's?
I think you're thinking of what Daimler would sells as the 30"
group, Jeff replaced them with new 30" BFGs.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
> and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
> inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
> while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
> have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
> gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
> personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
> with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
> good all around combination.
>
> Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
> answer for him.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
group, Jeff replaced them with new 30" BFGs.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Del Rawlins wrote:
>
> It isn't quite that simple because of the differences between nominal
> and actual sizes of tires. A lot of 30s are really only 29 or 29.5
> inches tall, whereas most 31s are just about right on 31 inches. And
> while that might not make a very big difference in clearance, it will
> have a bigger impact on his RPM at cruising speeds. With his 4.10
> gearing a 31" tire would probably be a better choice, although I would
> personally want to go for 32s, since that gives the same overall ratio
> with 4.10 that I have with 30 inch tires and 3.73 gearing, which is a
> good all around combination.
>
> Whether or not it is worth switching is something that nobody here can
> answer for him.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/