More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
#411
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
Well you probably don't want to hear that nuclear power plants were built by
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
#412
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
Well you probably don't want to hear that nuclear power plants were built by
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
#413
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
Well you probably don't want to hear that nuclear power plants were built by
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
the cheapest bidder...
Or the biggest bribe payer.
(same thing really, I suppose)
"Handywired" <handywired@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040606153155.02211.00000592@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > she also helped destroy the nuclear
> >power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been
> >good
> >for the country!
>
> Oh man. Just what we need. More nuc'ular power plants generating waste
so bad
> that they have to try to figure out how to communicate in sign language
to the
> cockroaches who will inherit the Earth after we get done f$^#%ing it up.
They
> have those pylon thingies with the pictographs at the nuc'ular waste dumps
so
> that 100,000 years from now, when the stuff is still too toxic to be
around,
> the poor future bastards will know who to blame for the fiasco... US!
Oh, and
> yeah... we know how to engineer structures to last 100,00+ years. Trust
us, of
> course we do. Let's just bury the stuff in a great big hole. Truuuust us
they
> say.
>
> One nuc'ular power plant "lets go" and entire geographical REGIONS are
> uninhabitable (uh, Chernobyl?). I could literally have to lose my home
and
> land (best case) if Hanford ever has a problem, for example. That is
--------.
> And saying that they have redundant safety systems, etc, is -------- too.
So
> do 747's.
>
> -jeff
>
> -jeff (enviromentalist who owns 2 chain saws)
#414
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: U.S Army diesel hybrids
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:13:24 -0700, L.W.------ wrote:
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
#415
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: U.S Army diesel hybrids
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:13:24 -0700, L.W.------ wrote:
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
#416
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: U.S Army diesel hybrids
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:13:24 -0700, L.W.------ wrote:
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
#417
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: U.S Army diesel hybrids
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:13:24 -0700, L.W.------ wrote:
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
> I always consider the source, to tell me who's paying for the
> evaluation. Rather than ask "why?" would the military use a hybrid?
> Rather stupid wouldn't you say?
Boo Hoo Bill. Ever heard of a Hummer? Oh, I forgot,... diesels suck.
Try this link, or go to Google and type in "GM Military Trucks"...
http://trucks.about.com/cs/militaryt...gm_miltary.htm
-bob-
#418
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
In article <40C13515.A8ABBE8@***.net>,
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
#419
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
In article <40C13515.A8ABBE8@***.net>,
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
#420
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
In article <40C13515.A8ABBE8@***.net>,
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> That's just it. I think they've all been scrapped at least ten
>years, so it's kind of like finding an Rambler American, or old Crosley:
>http://www.----------.com/crosley.jpg
That's not old.
I wanna convert my Jeep into a Stanley Steamer!!!!
I will be the only one on the road when the oil runs out!!!
Yahoo!!
:-)
--
<html><form><input type crash></form></html>
nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail