Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
It is what the bottle says and DC cannot dispute that under Federal Law. I
have only changed my oil in my 04 TJ twice. Besides Mobile 1 stands behind
their products and realistically how would DC know how often you change your
oil unless you tell them? They cannot tell by looking at it and if it looks
a little dirty you just say that it is time for an oil change.
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
have only changed my oil in my 04 TJ twice. Besides Mobile 1 stands behind
their products and realistically how would DC know how often you change your
oil unless you tell them? They cannot tell by looking at it and if it looks
a little dirty you just say that it is time for an oil change.
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
Try here
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
Try here
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
Try here
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
Try here
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/.../Homepage.aspx
--
Coasty
Semper Paratus
(Always Ready)
"Campbell C Freeman" <campbellcfreeman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8B5ne.13546$w21.10941@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
| Thanks,
|
| I intended to mention that one would (by default), have to abide by the
| manufacturer's specifications and requirements for recommended oil &
filter
| change intervals, NOT on what the bottle of oil says.
|
| All that being equal: Frequency of change intervals, similar driving
| circumstances & conditions, AND abiding by the DC Jeep Warranty
| requirements...then what is it?
|
|
| ...
| And it's MOBIL 1 NOT MobilE 1.
|
| Pardons please.
|
|
| "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
| news:429CDC07.97864CD2@***.net...
| > Probably need to grease a few palms at Society of Automotive
| > Engineers.
| > Two buzz words "Extended Performance" usually used to describe
| > snake oils.
| > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
| > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
| >
| > Campbell C Freeman wrote:
| >>
| >> What would be the difference (chemically, physically) between Mobile 1
| >> ("Classic - SuperSyn"), versus Mobile 1 Extended Performance (EP), that
| >> would cause M1 EP not to satisfy D/C Jeep New Car Warranty
Requirements,
| >> whereas Mobile 1 does?
| >>
| >> Is it: Mobile 1 SuperSyn meets ILSAC: GF-3 (energy conserving), & API
| >> SJ &
| >> Mobile 1 Extended Performance does not? Or is it deeper than that?
And
| >> is
| >> M1 EP hazardous to a new motor?
| >>
| >> SAE 10W30: Recommended for 2005 Wrangler (TJ) Rubicon 4 IL6. Both
| >> weights
| >> available in Mobile 1 & Mobile 1 EP.
| >>
| >> Please no fireballs...
| >>
| >> ...this is neither a debate about the merits (or lack thereof) of
| >> synthetic
| >> motor oils, nor the justifications for both dino & synthetic motor
oils.
| >>
| >> Thanks very much.
| >>
| >> Campbell Freeman
| >> South Carolina
|
|
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Coasty wrote:
>
> Old school Bill, most of the top end autos do not require oil changes until
> 10k. The extended version of Mobile 1 is not new they have been using it
> for several years. Both versions meet the manufacturers warranty for oil
> use the difference is in the frequency of RECOMMENDED changes. The
> recommended change interval is only that and use of extended life will not
> violate any vehicle warranty in the US by Federal Law. I have a pick-up
> truck with 150,000 miles on it and I have been changing the oil every 7500
> or 6 months which ever comes first. The biggest thing was finding an oil
> filter that lasted 7500 and I just changed it out twice. Now there are
> several brands on the market that last 7500 miles. Harley Davidson in the
> past couple of years got on the synthetic oil band wagon with their
> screaming chicken synIII after years of saying synthetic oil was snake oil,
> now all their bikes recommend oil and filter changes at 5,000 miles. The
> times they are a change in, don't get in a rut keep an open mind.
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mobile 1 & Moblie 1 EP Q
And of course, not changing oil until ten thousands miles on a TJ
under warranty would be silly:
http://www.----------.com/lubeschedule.pdf
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
> know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
> refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
> to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
> down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
> hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
under warranty would be silly:
http://www.----------.com/lubeschedule.pdf
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I don't know anyone whom thinks synthetic oil is snake oil, we all
> know it comes from the same refinery, with just a couple more
> refinements to the base oils. I'd probably use if it wasn't so expensive
> to drain every three thousand miles, and that's the only to keeps the pH
> down. The reason my heads have never been off of my Bronco at over three
> hundred and fifty thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------