LT1 Wrangler For Sale in Arizona (repost)
Guest
Posts: n/a
So Chris, what does your imagination tell a jet's standing quarter mile
ET is? If NHRA banned them I'm glad, they use to take so...... much time
away from serious drag racing. I been on the drag strip with them, and
took 8 mm pictures of them while they were there, couldn't even get them
in the same frame when the light turned green:
http://www.----------.com/temp/jetDragster.mpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
c wrote:
>
> You might be thinking of the rocket cars that NHRA banned several years ago.
> The jets do not compare to the current Top Fuel cars.
>
> Chris
ET is? If NHRA banned them I'm glad, they use to take so...... much time
away from serious drag racing. I been on the drag strip with them, and
took 8 mm pictures of them while they were there, couldn't even get them
in the same frame when the light turned green:
http://www.----------.com/temp/jetDragster.mpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
c wrote:
>
> You might be thinking of the rocket cars that NHRA banned several years ago.
> The jets do not compare to the current Top Fuel cars.
>
> Chris
Guest
Posts: n/a
Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
at eight seconds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Searching the net, I am unable to find any valid jet dragster numbers.
> The major sanctioning bodies do not actually sanction the jets anymore,
> just as they don't have rocket, compressed air, or electric car classes
> or ones for four wheel drive vehicles. (The electric guys have NEDRA).
> Since these are exhibition vhicles the ET and trap speeds may be
> accurate, but they are not recorded by the sanctioning bodies.
>
> What is obvious from a Web search is that most of these jet dragsters
> and funny cars are essentially hobby efforts and are running first and
> second generation jet engines long out of aircraft service. Obviously,
> legit competition and funds with more modern engines would drive speeds
> radically higher. I think Arfons was quoted as running in the low fives
> or high fours in the mid/late 60's.
Guest
Posts: n/a
You know, I can't impress upon you enough that if I thought a
surplus jet engine could have beat any dragster, I would have had one.
And that's a fact! Just like this was my car:
http://www.----------.com/temp/dragster.mpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
> speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
> carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
> at eight seconds.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
surplus jet engine could have beat any dragster, I would have had one.
And that's a fact! Just like this was my car:
http://www.----------.com/temp/dragster.mpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Geez, I wish you'd go see a drag race, and check their fifty foot
> speed. Remember, a jet needs a catapult just to get started off a
> carrier. There's no f**kin' way in hell they could beat super stock car
> at eight seconds.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------


