Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
11-12-2007, 06:40 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
Earle,
Your Spanish is amazing!
Regards,
Doug
Earle Horton wrote:
> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> do with the OP's stated problem.
>
> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo
> haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:035hj35on44eg7apnh69c26sugj3bjpm5b@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:16:49 -0000, wbowlin@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Today ( a week later) I reassembled he transmission, filled the
>>> transmission with fluid, filled the transfer case, rebled the clutch,
>>> etc and fired it up. I went to shift the Jeep into gear and I can not
>>> budge it into gear.
>>
>> Part of your mistake was driving it 60 miles with water in it. I know
>> you do not want to walk but there is a times when you do not drive
>> them far and this was one of them. Second mistake was letting it sit
>> empty for a wek and without doubt some rust has set in internally. You
>> show have drained and refilled it right away and maybe put a few oz's
>> of dry gas with lube too (alchol in dry gas can bind to water and oil)
>> drove it a bit and then drained it again as this would have removed
>> alll the water in there. At this stage, the damage is likely done and
>> you need to pull tranny and tear it down to inspect it. (I beleive you
>> stated it made noisy on way home and this is not good either) THere is
>> no magic fixes here and to suggest otherwise would be misleading at
>> this stage of the game.
>> -----------------
>> TheSnoMan.com
>
>
Your Spanish is amazing!
Regards,
Doug
Earle Horton wrote:
> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> do with the OP's stated problem.
>
> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo
> haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Earle
>
> "SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:035hj35on44eg7apnh69c26sugj3bjpm5b@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:16:49 -0000, wbowlin@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Today ( a week later) I reassembled he transmission, filled the
>>> transmission with fluid, filled the transfer case, rebled the clutch,
>>> etc and fired it up. I went to shift the Jeep into gear and I can not
>>> budge it into gear.
>>
>> Part of your mistake was driving it 60 miles with water in it. I know
>> you do not want to walk but there is a times when you do not drive
>> them far and this was one of them. Second mistake was letting it sit
>> empty for a wek and without doubt some rust has set in internally. You
>> show have drained and refilled it right away and maybe put a few oz's
>> of dry gas with lube too (alchol in dry gas can bind to water and oil)
>> drove it a bit and then drained it again as this would have removed
>> alll the water in there. At this stage, the damage is likely done and
>> you need to pull tranny and tear it down to inspect it. (I beleive you
>> stated it made noisy on way home and this is not good either) THere is
>> no magic fixes here and to suggest otherwise would be misleading at
>> this stage of the game.
>> -----------------
>> TheSnoMan.com
>
>
11-12-2007, 06:59 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <hrjhj3pbsu2mloq7pc5lt8e480iqmbpd61@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 06:59 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <hrjhj3pbsu2mloq7pc5lt8e480iqmbpd61@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 06:59 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <hrjhj3pbsu2mloq7pc5lt8e480iqmbpd61@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton" <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely nothing to
> >do with the OP's stated problem.
> >
> >And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
> >Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de manera tan
> >necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver con la queja del
> >puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el cambio de marchas, y la
> >respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda contestarla. ¿Por quéno lo
> >haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta idea!
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work.
This is the typical lame diatribe snoflake uses when he goes into
offense mode. This contains way fewer spelling errors than usual. Either
he's using spell check or he's sober at the moment.
> You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
LMAO nearly everything you write is in a different language.
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The word "dribble" is something he picked up from those writing about
his post. He very slowly picks these things up and tries to use them
against others. Its getting more laughable everytime he picks something
new up and attempts to use it in a scathing maner.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 07:00 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <1ekhj3pnmkvt2g4cfv2gfpp56182ahf3jh@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 07:00 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <1ekhj3pnmkvt2g4cfv2gfpp56182ahf3jh@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 07:00 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
In article <1ekhj3pnmkvt2g4cfv2gfpp56182ahf3jh@4ax.com>,
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
admin@snoman.com says...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:45 -0500, SnoMan <admin@snoman.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, you are notice how some of these cry babies like
> TheSnoMan.com
I already gave you an Email address because you wouldn't stop crying
about it. Did you miss it? Well Boo----inghoo. Poor little Snoball
couldn't read.
No one with an ounce of intellect would ever use their primary email
address on the USENET because it will obviously be harvested by spammers
or used by mental cases like snoflake here to make threats on peoples
lives in private.
Since you think having information out there is so damn important lets
get yours out in the open right now:
Jacob R. Stan
8525 MILTON CARLISLE RD
NEW CARLISLE, OH 45344
Still wanna keep going off on that temper tantrum?
Okay, I'll start posting your personal information when you do.
Snoman es de hecho un idiota.
Snoball these links contain things that "YOU" wrote. If you do not like
what YOU wrote then I suggest YOU stop posting.
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: 4T65E
http://tinyurl.com/2lcjkv
(Confuses a 4T65e with a 4L65e and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo
(Discribes the wrong brakes and won't admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
(Claims torque specs are wrong when they are not.)
__________________________________________________ _________
SBJ: Snoball Defense System v1.01
http://tinyurl.com/2okyfx
(Snoball breaks these out when he knows he's wrong
and doesn't want to admit it.)
__________________________________________________ _________
11-12-2007, 08:13 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
SnoMan wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
11-12-2007, 08:13 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
SnoMan wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
11-12-2007, 08:13 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Jeep in water - now transmission will not work
SnoMan wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0700, "Earle Horton"
> <123456@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> SnoMan you are a moron. This is all true but it has absolutely
>> nothing to do with the OP's stated problem.
>>
>> And for our Spanish-speaking friends.
>> Snoman eres morón y hijo de la gran puta. Lo que balbuceas de
>> manera tan necia es verdad, sí claro, pero no tiene nada que ver
>> con
>> la queja del puteador original. El tío no puede manipular el
>> cambio
>> de marchas, y la respuesta es tan sencillo que un novato pueda
>> contestarla. ¿Por qué no lo haces? ¡Porque no tienes ni puta
>> idea!
>
>
> The moron here is you as usual. Even if the shifter came out of
> ralils
> it would not come out unless a LOT of force was apply to shift it
> and
> that means it was binding and it was forced. It was binding from
> rust
> and/or damage and people like you are dangerous because you are
> really
> clueless and try to plant false hopes. You never want to treat cause
> (because it escapes you) only the symptoms best you can with your
> limited understanding of how and why things work. You really should
> take up a different language because your advise is worthless anyway
> so you might as well speak it in a foreign tongue too. Someone would
> be very foolish to follow your dribble in this thread.
Uh, he said that he removed the transmission completely. That would
imply that he had removed the lever, thus giving the opportunity to
put it back incorrectly, so there is no need for "a LOT of force" to
have been applied.
Instead of getting pissed off why don't you try actually _reading_ the
post to which you are responding?
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)