I had the regular one. I would have liked to have this one.
Tomes

"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:ed026$440bc4f4$4831b233$32072@FUSE.NET...
>I liked the Gremlin. They probably could have sold a lot of the 4x4
>version if it had been available.
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B8A28.BE22CA3C@***.net...
>> http://www.----------.com/temp/gremlin4x4.jpg
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:--------------------
>>
>> Lon wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think they ever had 4WD.
>
>

 

I had the regular one. I would have liked to have this one.
Tomes

"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:ed026$440bc4f4$4831b233$32072@FUSE.NET...
>I liked the Gremlin. They probably could have sold a lot of the 4x4
>version if it had been available.
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B8A28.BE22CA3C@***.net...
>> http://www.----------.com/temp/gremlin4x4.jpg
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:--------------------
>>
>> Lon wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think they ever had 4WD.
>
>

 

I had the regular one. I would have liked to have this one.
Tomes

"billy ray" <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:ed026$440bc4f4$4831b233$32072@FUSE.NET...
>I liked the Gremlin. They probably could have sold a lot of the 4x4
>version if it had been available.
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B8A28.BE22CA3C@***.net...
>> http://www.----------.com/temp/gremlin4x4.jpg
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:--------------------
>>
>> Lon wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think they ever had 4WD.
>
>

 

You again posted out of sequence! OK, you show me where I'm WRONG!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...4a0ce0db0b9490
And you're the waste of time! Who runs your business?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Click the Google link you posted. Reread the thread I indicated.
> Go ahead and have the last word, I'm finished wasting my time with you.

 

You again posted out of sequence! OK, you show me where I'm WRONG!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...4a0ce0db0b9490
And you're the waste of time! Who runs your business?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Click the Google link you posted. Reread the thread I indicated.
> Go ahead and have the last word, I'm finished wasting my time with you.

 

You again posted out of sequence! OK, you show me where I'm WRONG!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...4a0ce0db0b9490
And you're the waste of time! Who runs your business?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Click the Google link you posted. Reread the thread I indicated.
> Go ahead and have the last word, I'm finished wasting my time with you.

 

You again posted out of sequence! OK, you show me where I'm WRONG!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...4a0ce0db0b9490
And you're the waste of time! Who runs your business?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Click the Google link you posted. Reread the thread I indicated.
> Go ahead and have the last word, I'm finished wasting my time with you.

 

In truth, I was hoping someone more familiar with the transfer case
would know the answer. I have a different one and there was only one
that had the 2h 4h 4l settings--I'm just not at all familiar with it.
Of course some folks will still insist on looking for the vacuum line.


Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:

> I would not begin troubleshooting by suggesting to the OP to look for
> components the vehicle doesn't have, you'll just confuse him. Like I posted,
> I thought the T case linkage might be out of adjustment and the T case
> wasn't shifting all the way out of 4wd.
>
> The axle disconnects were vacuum-operated, that's the reason why there is a
> vacuum switch for the indicator on those models.
>
> In fact XJ's DID stop using vacuum switches when they went to one-piece
> axles. My '93 XJ, with a one-piece front axle, had an electrical switch. I
> know that because the 4wd indicator light did not light up in any position,
> and I determined it was probably a bad switch or an electrical failure
> between the switch and the light.
>
> Lon checked his 95 Grand FSM, no mention of a vacuum switch.
>
> Any further questions?
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B76F2.12E5799A@***.net...
>
>>Matt,
>> And where would you begin to trouble shot and fix the Original
>>Poster warning light. And Who and the f**k is talking about an axle
>>disconnect??????? Do you think the XJs stopped using the vacuum switch
>>when they switch to the one piece axles??????
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>Like I said...
>>>
>>>What you're seeing in the pic of the full driveline is the wiring harness
>>>and vent tube. In the T case pics, you're looking at the electrical
>>>position
>>>indicator switch connector. Only the Jeeps with a front axle disconnect
>>>had
>>>the vacuum switch, and no Grand ever had the front axle disconnect.
>
>
>

 

In truth, I was hoping someone more familiar with the transfer case
would know the answer. I have a different one and there was only one
that had the 2h 4h 4l settings--I'm just not at all familiar with it.
Of course some folks will still insist on looking for the vacuum line.


Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:

> I would not begin troubleshooting by suggesting to the OP to look for
> components the vehicle doesn't have, you'll just confuse him. Like I posted,
> I thought the T case linkage might be out of adjustment and the T case
> wasn't shifting all the way out of 4wd.
>
> The axle disconnects were vacuum-operated, that's the reason why there is a
> vacuum switch for the indicator on those models.
>
> In fact XJ's DID stop using vacuum switches when they went to one-piece
> axles. My '93 XJ, with a one-piece front axle, had an electrical switch. I
> know that because the 4wd indicator light did not light up in any position,
> and I determined it was probably a bad switch or an electrical failure
> between the switch and the light.
>
> Lon checked his 95 Grand FSM, no mention of a vacuum switch.
>
> Any further questions?
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B76F2.12E5799A@***.net...
>
>>Matt,
>> And where would you begin to trouble shot and fix the Original
>>Poster warning light. And Who and the f**k is talking about an axle
>>disconnect??????? Do you think the XJs stopped using the vacuum switch
>>when they switch to the one piece axles??????
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>Like I said...
>>>
>>>What you're seeing in the pic of the full driveline is the wiring harness
>>>and vent tube. In the T case pics, you're looking at the electrical
>>>position
>>>indicator switch connector. Only the Jeeps with a front axle disconnect
>>>had
>>>the vacuum switch, and no Grand ever had the front axle disconnect.
>
>
>

 

In truth, I was hoping someone more familiar with the transfer case
would know the answer. I have a different one and there was only one
that had the 2h 4h 4l settings--I'm just not at all familiar with it.
Of course some folks will still insist on looking for the vacuum line.


Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:

> I would not begin troubleshooting by suggesting to the OP to look for
> components the vehicle doesn't have, you'll just confuse him. Like I posted,
> I thought the T case linkage might be out of adjustment and the T case
> wasn't shifting all the way out of 4wd.
>
> The axle disconnects were vacuum-operated, that's the reason why there is a
> vacuum switch for the indicator on those models.
>
> In fact XJ's DID stop using vacuum switches when they went to one-piece
> axles. My '93 XJ, with a one-piece front axle, had an electrical switch. I
> know that because the 4wd indicator light did not light up in any position,
> and I determined it was probably a bad switch or an electrical failure
> between the switch and the light.
>
> Lon checked his 95 Grand FSM, no mention of a vacuum switch.
>
> Any further questions?
>
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:440B76F2.12E5799A@***.net...
>
>>Matt,
>> And where would you begin to trouble shot and fix the Original
>>Poster warning light. And Who and the f**k is talking about an axle
>>disconnect??????? Do you think the XJs stopped using the vacuum switch
>>when they switch to the one piece axles??????
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>Like I said...
>>>
>>>What you're seeing in the pic of the full driveline is the wiring harness
>>>and vent tube. In the T case pics, you're looking at the electrical
>>>position
>>>indicator switch connector. Only the Jeeps with a front axle disconnect
>>>had
>>>the vacuum switch, and no Grand ever had the front axle disconnect.
>
>
>