http://www.moynihaninstitute.org/walmart.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jim85CJ wrote:
>
> "Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
> (partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
> low-cost labor)."
> Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
> THANKS!

 

http://www.moynihaninstitute.org/walmart.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jim85CJ wrote:
>
> "Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
> (partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
> low-cost labor)."
> Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
> THANKS!

 

http://www.moynihaninstitute.org/walmart.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jim85CJ wrote:
>
> "Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
> (partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
> low-cost labor)."
> Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
> THANKS!

 

http://www.moynihaninstitute.org/walmart.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jim85CJ wrote:
>
> "Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
> (partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
> low-cost labor)."
> Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
> THANKS!

 

You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?

The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.

>truth hurts?
>
>Wblane wrote:
>
>> What a putz.
>>
>>
>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>THANKS!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)


-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?

The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.

>truth hurts?
>
>Wblane wrote:
>
>> What a putz.
>>
>>
>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>THANKS!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)


-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?

The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.

>truth hurts?
>
>Wblane wrote:
>
>> What a putz.
>>
>>
>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>THANKS!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)


-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?

The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.

>truth hurts?
>
>Wblane wrote:
>
>> What a putz.
>>
>>
>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>THANKS!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)


-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

Nope, not a lawyer, just someone who made something of themselves
without relying on corrupt groups. I was part of a union once. I was
forced to join when I had no need for them at all. Making minimum wage
and they took a good percentage of that for NOTHING back to me.

Unions were "useful" once. Not so much anymore.

"why don't you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW
and tell them what you think of unions."
ooohhh... will the big bad retards start beating me up??? Sounds about
right for union members.

Wblane wrote:

> You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
> you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
> you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
> had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?
>
> The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
> higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
> management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.
>
>
>>truth hurts?
>>
>>Wblane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What a putz.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>>THANKS!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

Nope, not a lawyer, just someone who made something of themselves
without relying on corrupt groups. I was part of a union once. I was
forced to join when I had no need for them at all. Making minimum wage
and they took a good percentage of that for NOTHING back to me.

Unions were "useful" once. Not so much anymore.

"why don't you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW
and tell them what you think of unions."
ooohhh... will the big bad retards start beating me up??? Sounds about
right for union members.

Wblane wrote:

> You're a real dickweed for slaggin on unions. I'll tell ya what pal, why don't
> you go down to your local teamsters union, or maybe the UAW and tell them what
> you think of unions. All I can guess is you're a dickweed that's never really
> had to work for a living in his entire life. Let me guess, you're a lawyer?
>
> The local supermarkets here in SoCal went on strike a few months back, not for
> higher wages but to keep their medical benefits intact. The a-holes in
> management didn't want to flip the bill for medical benefits anymore.
>
>
>>truth hurts?
>>
>>Wblane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What a putz.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Walmart drives local businesses out by undercutting their prices
>>>>(partly by having the cheapest labor costs around, by using non-union,
>>>>low-cost labor)."
>>>>Wow, a liberal finally admits that UNIONS drive up costs and are bad...
>>>>THANKS!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)