Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#7250
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?
In article <vvk7pqm03n1jd0@corp.supernews.com>, stroyer@cableone.net
says...
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3ff72a19@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "Stroyer" <stroyer@cableone.net> wrote in message
> > news:vvdtb78hdq3g69@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Hey guys, I think we're missing the overal point, if we're talking
> Global
> > > Warming. As far as environmental controls go, you guys are correct in
> > that
> > > we can't implement world environmental policy when the bigger developing
> > > countries like China refuse to play.
> >
> > You mean Developed countries like America? They decided to ratiy the
> treaty
> > then Bush said no...
> > So much dfor democracy, thats a dictatorship.
>
> Nope... I mean DEVELOPING countries like China. By actually checking out
> the Kioto treaty verbiage, you might also discover that the treaty had
> absolutely no teeth.... that the price would be paid by the US, but with
> essentially no real effect. These other countries would have to do
> essentially nothing per the treaty, but the US would have to place
> significant restrictions on the already strict emissions standards,
> resulting in huge costs and essentially no positive benefit.
We wouldn't want to stop the US buying pollution credits from developing
countries now would we.
>
> Hmmm.... so the 1 or 2 degrees of additional temperature (based on an
> arbitrary "baseline" that fits the argument) would then result in snow falls
> in the range of 30% or more over average? Interesting. When I was studying
> for my physics degree, I don't recall the evaporation rates rising at
> exponential rates with respect to the temperature. For that matter, it
> would only make sense that there must have been a major global cooling trend
> in the 30s that caused the dust bowl, eh?
>
> The real problem is that there is a significant difference between CLIMATE
As sure as I am that there was a rain forest in my back yard where there
is snow now, I'm sure there will be again some day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
says...
>
> "rnf2" <rnf2@NOSPAMwaikato.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:3ff72a19@news.iconz.co.nz...
> >
> > "Stroyer" <stroyer@cableone.net> wrote in message
> > news:vvdtb78hdq3g69@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Hey guys, I think we're missing the overal point, if we're talking
> Global
> > > Warming. As far as environmental controls go, you guys are correct in
> > that
> > > we can't implement world environmental policy when the bigger developing
> > > countries like China refuse to play.
> >
> > You mean Developed countries like America? They decided to ratiy the
> treaty
> > then Bush said no...
> > So much dfor democracy, thats a dictatorship.
>
> Nope... I mean DEVELOPING countries like China. By actually checking out
> the Kioto treaty verbiage, you might also discover that the treaty had
> absolutely no teeth.... that the price would be paid by the US, but with
> essentially no real effect. These other countries would have to do
> essentially nothing per the treaty, but the US would have to place
> significant restrictions on the already strict emissions standards,
> resulting in huge costs and essentially no positive benefit.
We wouldn't want to stop the US buying pollution credits from developing
countries now would we.
>
> Hmmm.... so the 1 or 2 degrees of additional temperature (based on an
> arbitrary "baseline" that fits the argument) would then result in snow falls
> in the range of 30% or more over average? Interesting. When I was studying
> for my physics degree, I don't recall the evaporation rates rising at
> exponential rates with respect to the temperature. For that matter, it
> would only make sense that there must have been a major global cooling trend
> in the 30s that caused the dust bowl, eh?
>
> The real problem is that there is a significant difference between CLIMATE
As sure as I am that there was a rain forest in my back yard where there
is snow now, I'm sure there will be again some day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.