Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nick N wrote:
> "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
>
>>C. E. White wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Del Rawlins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
>>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone equally.
>
>
> or just keep crossposting.
> Please everyone. Stop.
> Nick
>
>
Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to" line.
> "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
>
>>C. E. White wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Del Rawlins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
>>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone equally.
>
>
> or just keep crossposting.
> Please everyone. Stop.
> Nick
>
>
Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to" line.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nick N wrote:
> "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
>
>>C. E. White wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Del Rawlins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
>>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone equally.
>
>
> or just keep crossposting.
> Please everyone. Stop.
> Nick
>
>
Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to" line.
> "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
>
>>C. E. White wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Del Rawlins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
>>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone equally.
>
>
> or just keep crossposting.
> Please everyone. Stop.
> Nick
>
>
Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to" line.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd parker parker@learnlink.emory.edu started this mess. See
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd parker parker@learnlink.emory.edu started this mess. See
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lloyd parker parker@learnlink.emory.edu started this mess. See
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/xrz7 for a look at over 55 thousand messages. To this
day, probably two months later, him and other people are keeping this way OT
thread alive and clogging our newsgroups with THOUSANDS of messages. It is
time to kill this or take it elsewhere!
Lloyd has already being reported to his university and the other people who
keep posting multiple times are also slowly being reported to their
according abuse@ addresses. for example, abuse@mci abuse@umich abuse@rogers
(you know who you are) and a few others. We at Jeep+****** newsgroup are
fed up and fighting back. I would guess many people are going to start
having isp problems unless they quit this abuse. On the other hand, I have
no problem if they just start maybe a yahoo group or someplace they can
argue tell their blue. Steve, I don't know what newsgroup you originate
from but I appreciate your interest and support.
Nick
"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:4sadnUhpIuanKVKiRTvUrg@texas.net...
> Nick N wrote:
>
> > "Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> > news:tdudnVlyI7iWC1KiRTvUqA@texas.net...
> >
> >>C. E. White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Del Rawlins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The only equitable solution is for the government to get out of the
> >>>>marriage business completely. That ought to **** off everyone
equally.
> >
> >
> > or just keep crossposting.
> > Please everyone. Stop.
> > Nick
> >
> >
>
> Fine. Exactly who started the crossposting? Which groups are "cross
> posted" and which ones belong? Its clearly OT in any group in the "to"
line.
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:16:23 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:16:23 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:16:23 -0500, "The Ancient One"
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
<onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>And yet the exodus from Canada to the US for treatment continues unabaited.
>To be so bad here it is amazing that so many come here from so many
>countries, giving up free care for prompt, high quality care here. You get
>reallly sick there, you get a tumor that requires immediate surgery, but the
>system is over budget and you're put on a six to twelve month waiting list,
>and then we'll see how fast you come running to America for immediate
>treatment.
It's not quite that simple. If you need a procedure, they evaluate
how urgent it is. If it's extremely urgent you get bumped to the top
of the list. If it's not so urgent, you get on the waiting list and
get done after others who have been waiting longer are processed. If
you don't want to wait and can afford it, you go to somewhere that you
can pay for the procedure, which is down south. A great system if
you're wealthy.
I know that no matter what happens, if I blow out my knee I'm going to
get an MRI. It may take 8 weeks, but I'll get it and it won't cost me
anything extra. Can you say the same thing?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:35:42 GMT, "David J. Allen"
<dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"vlj" <v@l.j> wrote in message
>news:FQrzb.40111$vn.96228@sea-read.news.verio.net...
>> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> sez:
>> <snip>
>> >It is not a marriage. <snip>
>>
>> Marriage started out as a property rite of ancient societies. It was then
>> co-opted by the church(es). Then governments got into the act when the
>> church was no longer one in the same as the government.
>>
>> Sticking to a dogmatic ritual that had its roots in protection of property
>> and bloodlines when the involved had little say or choice in the matter and
>> then foist that definition on everyone at large in today's society is most
>> medieval ...
>>
>
>Sounds like the first lecture in Feminism 101. Talk about dogma! The
>purpose of marriage, even to patriarchal societies, is still vital for the
>purpose of raising children.
So what if one of members of the couple is sterile? Should they be
prevented from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
<dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"vlj" <v@l.j> wrote in message
>news:FQrzb.40111$vn.96228@sea-read.news.verio.net...
>> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> sez:
>> <snip>
>> >It is not a marriage. <snip>
>>
>> Marriage started out as a property rite of ancient societies. It was then
>> co-opted by the church(es). Then governments got into the act when the
>> church was no longer one in the same as the government.
>>
>> Sticking to a dogmatic ritual that had its roots in protection of property
>> and bloodlines when the involved had little say or choice in the matter and
>> then foist that definition on everyone at large in today's society is most
>> medieval ...
>>
>
>Sounds like the first lecture in Feminism 101. Talk about dogma! The
>purpose of marriage, even to patriarchal societies, is still vital for the
>purpose of raising children.
So what if one of members of the couple is sterile? Should they be
prevented from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:35:42 GMT, "David J. Allen"
<dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"vlj" <v@l.j> wrote in message
>news:FQrzb.40111$vn.96228@sea-read.news.verio.net...
>> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> sez:
>> <snip>
>> >It is not a marriage. <snip>
>>
>> Marriage started out as a property rite of ancient societies. It was then
>> co-opted by the church(es). Then governments got into the act when the
>> church was no longer one in the same as the government.
>>
>> Sticking to a dogmatic ritual that had its roots in protection of property
>> and bloodlines when the involved had little say or choice in the matter and
>> then foist that definition on everyone at large in today's society is most
>> medieval ...
>>
>
>Sounds like the first lecture in Feminism 101. Talk about dogma! The
>purpose of marriage, even to patriarchal societies, is still vital for the
>purpose of raising children.
So what if one of members of the couple is sterile? Should they be
prevented from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
<dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"vlj" <v@l.j> wrote in message
>news:FQrzb.40111$vn.96228@sea-read.news.verio.net...
>> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> sez:
>> <snip>
>> >It is not a marriage. <snip>
>>
>> Marriage started out as a property rite of ancient societies. It was then
>> co-opted by the church(es). Then governments got into the act when the
>> church was no longer one in the same as the government.
>>
>> Sticking to a dogmatic ritual that had its roots in protection of property
>> and bloodlines when the involved had little say or choice in the matter and
>> then foist that definition on everyone at large in today's society is most
>> medieval ...
>>
>
>Sounds like the first lecture in Feminism 101. Talk about dogma! The
>purpose of marriage, even to patriarchal societies, is still vital for the
>purpose of raising children.
So what if one of members of the couple is sterile? Should they be
prevented from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.


