Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal fluctuations in
climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities as an
explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.

 

In article <bpgqk6$c1v$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>, Robert A. Matern wrote:
> Are we on the verge of another ice age?
>
> The ice ages come in cycles... the variation in tilt (wobble) of the earth
> on it rotational axis has a period of 23,000 years... and the 41,000 year
> precession of the equinoxes plus other 100,000 and 413,000 year cycles.
>
> Milankovich predicted ice ages every half-cycle (11,500 is half of 23,00)
> and since the last ice age ended 11,500 years ago...
>
> Are we now near the end of the cycle(s)... when the ice age cycle begins
> again?
>
> What if we're not facing 2 degrees warmer, but 10 degrees colder instead?


Oh, but there is the idea that global warming will melt too much ice
reducing the salinity of oceans, changing the currents, shuting down
the gulf stream, and resulting in a ICE AGE.

 

In article <bpgqk6$c1v$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>, Robert A. Matern wrote:
> Are we on the verge of another ice age?
>
> The ice ages come in cycles... the variation in tilt (wobble) of the earth
> on it rotational axis has a period of 23,000 years... and the 41,000 year
> precession of the equinoxes plus other 100,000 and 413,000 year cycles.
>
> Milankovich predicted ice ages every half-cycle (11,500 is half of 23,00)
> and since the last ice age ended 11,500 years ago...
>
> Are we now near the end of the cycle(s)... when the ice age cycle begins
> again?
>
> What if we're not facing 2 degrees warmer, but 10 degrees colder instead?


Oh, but there is the idea that global warming will melt too much ice
reducing the salinity of oceans, changing the currents, shuting down
the gulf stream, and resulting in a ICE AGE.

 

In article <bpgqk6$c1v$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>, Robert A. Matern wrote:
> Are we on the verge of another ice age?
>
> The ice ages come in cycles... the variation in tilt (wobble) of the earth
> on it rotational axis has a period of 23,000 years... and the 41,000 year
> precession of the equinoxes plus other 100,000 and 413,000 year cycles.
>
> Milankovich predicted ice ages every half-cycle (11,500 is half of 23,00)
> and since the last ice age ended 11,500 years ago...
>
> Are we now near the end of the cycle(s)... when the ice age cycle begins
> again?
>
> What if we're not facing 2 degrees warmer, but 10 degrees colder instead?


Oh, but there is the idea that global warming will melt too much ice
reducing the salinity of oceans, changing the currents, shuting down
the gulf stream, and resulting in a ICE AGE.

 

All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...

Earle

"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal fluctuations
in
> climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities as
an
> explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
>
>

 

All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...

Earle

"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal fluctuations
in
> climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities as
an
> explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
>
>

 

All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...

Earle

"Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal fluctuations
in
> climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities as
an
> explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
>
>

 

Hey, Earle, how much snow up there?

Looks like there's more on the way for the weekend.
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bph2cd$1lssko$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...
>
> Earle
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> > Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> > documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> in
> > climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> > anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> an
> > explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >
> >
>
>

 

Hey, Earle, how much snow up there?

Looks like there's more on the way for the weekend.
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bph2cd$1lssko$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...
>
> Earle
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> > Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> > documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> in
> > climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> > anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> an
> > explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >
> >
>
>

 

Hey, Earle, how much snow up there?

Looks like there's more on the way for the weekend.
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bph2cd$1lssko$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> All that matters is that I have enough ski wax...
>
> Earle
>
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com...
> > Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> > documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> in
> > climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will refute
> > anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> an
> > explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >
> >
>
>