> Interesting. Those who propose free choice are fascists. Those who propose
less governmental interference are fascists.
When I look up 'fascist', that's not even close to the definition I get. <

Well, in Lloyd's politically correct, all-must-be-equal world, you wouldn't
have a dictionary to look it up in, nor be literate enough to read it
anyway. That way we can ensure the equality of mankind and the salvation of
the Earth!

(I think Lloyd is runing out of spit, each response is less lucid than the
previous one.)

 

> Interesting. Those who propose free choice are fascists. Those who propose
less governmental interference are fascists.
When I look up 'fascist', that's not even close to the definition I get. <

Well, in Lloyd's politically correct, all-must-be-equal world, you wouldn't
have a dictionary to look it up in, nor be literate enough to read it
anyway. That way we can ensure the equality of mankind and the salvation of
the Earth!

(I think Lloyd is runing out of spit, each response is less lucid than the
previous one.)

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:boguuq02a9i@enews2.newsguy.com...
> Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

lloyd and i go way back, and we gotta long way to go yet.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:boguuq02a9i@enews2.newsguy.com...
> Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

lloyd and i go way back, and we gotta long way to go yet.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:boguuq02a9i@enews2.newsguy.com...
> Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

lloyd and i go way back, and we gotta long way to go yet.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bog8vs$44t$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vql718crgh8be9@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:boe5bg$i0q$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
> >> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Joe wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> >> >> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet.
It
> >> >would
> >> >> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets
fires
> >> >burn
> >> >> until
> >> >> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they
are
> >in
> >> >> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots
of
> >> >> pollution
> >> >> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in
the
> >> >first
> >> >> > place....didn't you?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ed
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed
into
> >the
> >> >> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
> >> >thinning
> >> >> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and
> >contributing
> >> >> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my
> >little
> >> >> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on
Sunday
> >> >morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way
> >across
> >> >the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in
> >history
> >> >to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day!
The
> >> >whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
> >> >
> >> >Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of
> >large
> >> >cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973
CAFE
> >> >regulations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
> >
> >Prove it.
> >
> >
> http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/ag...o_Peanuts.html

As I thought you couldn't do it. If I posted a site like that to prove a
point to you, you would dismiss it as right wing garbage because it doesn't
come from a peer reviewed jounal. You should hold yourself to the standards
you demand from others Lloyd, now again, prove it.
BTW, what peer reviewed journals do you read Lloyd, and what articles have
you published in peer reviewed journals?

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bog8vs$44t$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vql718crgh8be9@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:boe5bg$i0q$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
> >> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Joe wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> >> >> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet.
It
> >> >would
> >> >> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets
fires
> >> >burn
> >> >> until
> >> >> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they
are
> >in
> >> >> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots
of
> >> >> pollution
> >> >> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in
the
> >> >first
> >> >> > place....didn't you?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ed
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed
into
> >the
> >> >> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
> >> >thinning
> >> >> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and
> >contributing
> >> >> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my
> >little
> >> >> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on
Sunday
> >> >morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way
> >across
> >> >the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in
> >history
> >> >to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day!
The
> >> >whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
> >> >
> >> >Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of
> >large
> >> >cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973
CAFE
> >> >regulations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
> >
> >Prove it.
> >
> >
> http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/ag...o_Peanuts.html

As I thought you couldn't do it. If I posted a site like that to prove a
point to you, you would dismiss it as right wing garbage because it doesn't
come from a peer reviewed jounal. You should hold yourself to the standards
you demand from others Lloyd, now again, prove it.
BTW, what peer reviewed journals do you read Lloyd, and what articles have
you published in peer reviewed journals?

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bog8vs$44t$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vql718crgh8be9@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:boe5bg$i0q$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
> >> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Joe wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> >> >> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet.
It
> >> >would
> >> >> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets
fires
> >> >burn
> >> >> until
> >> >> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they
are
> >in
> >> >> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots
of
> >> >> pollution
> >> >> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in
the
> >> >first
> >> >> > place....didn't you?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ed
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed
into
> >the
> >> >> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
> >> >thinning
> >> >> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and
> >contributing
> >> >> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my
> >little
> >> >> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on
Sunday
> >> >morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way
> >across
> >> >the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in
> >history
> >> >to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day!
The
> >> >whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
> >> >
> >> >Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of
> >large
> >> >cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973
CAFE
> >> >regulations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
> >
> >Prove it.
> >
> >
> http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/ag...o_Peanuts.html

As I thought you couldn't do it. If I posted a site like that to prove a
point to you, you would dismiss it as right wing garbage because it doesn't
come from a peer reviewed jounal. You should hold yourself to the standards
you demand from others Lloyd, now again, prove it.
BTW, what peer reviewed journals do you read Lloyd, and what articles have
you published in peer reviewed journals?

 

Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FAB8527.5FDF3CE2@kinez.net>...
> Well he just offended 95% of the "average guy" in the last couple of
> days with his spastic tap dancing. Al Sharpton still hasn't decided if

Were you offended? I wasn't. Speak for youself, lest you become a
"Sharpton" of your own.

The only think that got me upset was that he apologized at all to that
*****.

 

Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FAB8527.5FDF3CE2@kinez.net>...
> Well he just offended 95% of the "average guy" in the last couple of
> days with his spastic tap dancing. Al Sharpton still hasn't decided if

Were you offended? I wasn't. Speak for youself, lest you become a
"Sharpton" of your own.

The only think that got me upset was that he apologized at all to that
*****.