> Assuming government spending is linked to government income, when you tax
people, you take the money out of their hands and into the hands of an
entity that does not save. The government expands to fill all possible
revenue.<

Replace "fill" with "waste nearly all" and you unerestand government.

> So, a tax cut will pull money out of the active economy, causing a
recession. <

Hmm,. I guess that's why Reagan's tax cut more than douled tax revenues back
to the Govt! (Where the Hell did you get YOUR economics degree, McDonalds?)

 

> Assuming government spending is linked to government income, when you tax
people, you take the money out of their hands and into the hands of an
entity that does not save. The government expands to fill all possible
revenue.<

Replace "fill" with "waste nearly all" and you unerestand government.

> So, a tax cut will pull money out of the active economy, causing a
recession. <

Hmm,. I guess that's why Reagan's tax cut more than douled tax revenues back
to the Govt! (Where the Hell did you get YOUR economics degree, McDonalds?)

 

> Assuming government spending is linked to government income, when you tax
people, you take the money out of their hands and into the hands of an
entity that does not save. The government expands to fill all possible
revenue.<

Replace "fill" with "waste nearly all" and you unerestand government.

> So, a tax cut will pull money out of the active economy, causing a
recession. <

Hmm,. I guess that's why Reagan's tax cut more than douled tax revenues back
to the Govt! (Where the Hell did you get YOUR economics degree, McDonalds?)

 

> How did Clinton effect the dot.com bubble? <

Why, Al Gore invented the Internet, of course, don't you remember?


> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"

 

> How did Clinton effect the dot.com bubble? <

Why, Al Gore invented the Internet, of course, don't you remember?


> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"

 

> How did Clinton effect the dot.com bubble? <

Why, Al Gore invented the Internet, of course, don't you remember?


> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"

 

> What does science tell us about prior warming periods? <

Well, it depends what "scientists" you ask. If you ask the greenies, there's
nver been any period of waqrming, the earth and it's atmosphere were in
perfect balance before man and his SUVs came along.

If you ask other scientists, they'll tell you the earth is in a continual,
gradual shift between periods of warming & cooling, caused between
geothermal, solar and magnetic variables. They point to the ice age, and the
creation of massive deserts like the Sahara as proof....Lloyd's scientists
are certain these events were caused by primitives driving gas-guzzling
Hummer SUVs
>

 

> What does science tell us about prior warming periods? <

Well, it depends what "scientists" you ask. If you ask the greenies, there's
nver been any period of waqrming, the earth and it's atmosphere were in
perfect balance before man and his SUVs came along.

If you ask other scientists, they'll tell you the earth is in a continual,
gradual shift between periods of warming & cooling, caused between
geothermal, solar and magnetic variables. They point to the ice age, and the
creation of massive deserts like the Sahara as proof....Lloyd's scientists
are certain these events were caused by primitives driving gas-guzzling
Hummer SUVs
>

 

> What does science tell us about prior warming periods? <

Well, it depends what "scientists" you ask. If you ask the greenies, there's
nver been any period of waqrming, the earth and it's atmosphere were in
perfect balance before man and his SUVs came along.

If you ask other scientists, they'll tell you the earth is in a continual,
gradual shift between periods of warming & cooling, caused between
geothermal, solar and magnetic variables. They point to the ice age, and the
creation of massive deserts like the Sahara as proof....Lloyd's scientists
are certain these events were caused by primitives driving gas-guzzling
Hummer SUVs
>

 

> Interesting. Those who propose free choice are fascists. Those who propose
less governmental interference are fascists.
When I look up 'fascist', that's not even close to the definition I get. <

Well, in Lloyd's politically correct, all-must-be-equal world, you wouldn't
have a dictionary to look it up in, nor be literate enough to read it
anyway. That way we can ensure the equality of mankind and the salvation of
the Earth!

(I think Lloyd is runing out of spit, each response is less lucid than the
previous one.)