heard back from emory
12-03-2003, 04:25 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
12-03-2003, 04:25 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
12-03-2003, 04:25 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
>conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
>better lately).
>
I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never mind
that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong about
the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it, even
when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I hope
Emory yanks his network priviliges.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
12-03-2003, 05:02 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
should more people complain?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 05:02 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
should more people complain?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 05:02 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
should more people complain?
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 06:39 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
I didnt read the original post about ford crown vics burning when hit from
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 06:39 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
I didnt read the original post about ford crown vics burning when hit from
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 06:39 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
I didnt read the original post about ford crown vics burning when hit from
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
burned. Mostly it involves police cars, because there are so many of them
that get hit while they are stopped on the road. Makes me think of the
pinto.
Dan Ferrell
84 CJ-7
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031203162510.01893.00001969@mb-m22.aol.com...
> In article <bqlj7c$243f4i$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe"
> <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:
>
> >Understood... I have been guilty to joining that thread off and on. As a
> >conservative, it's hard to read that drivel and NOT respond (I've been
> >better lately).
> >
> I had my fill of Parker when he was posting in alt.trucks.ford in a thread
> about parked Crown Vic patrol cars catching fire when hit from behind by a
> speeding truck. Of course he believed it was a design flaw by Ford, never
mind
> that no vehicle could survive such a collision. He was completely wrong
about
> the location of the Crown Vic fuel tank, but of course never admitted it,
even
> when presented with a diagram from a FSM. In short, he's hopeless, and I
hope
> Emory yanks his network priviliges.
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>
>
>
>
12-03-2003, 06:46 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: heard back from emory
In article <Wruzb.454$Yl.290@bignews1.bellsouth.net>, "Dan Ferrell"
<dkf92@bellsouth.net> writes:
>I didnt read the original post about ford crown vics burning when hit from
>the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
>burned.
I'll bet it wasn't a mere fender bender. What other impact damage was there?
Oh jeez, what did I start....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<dkf92@bellsouth.net> writes:
>I didnt read the original post about ford crown vics burning when hit from
>the rear, but they will. A friend of mine was hit in the rear and it
>burned.
I'll bet it wasn't a mere fender bender. What other impact damage was there?
Oh jeez, what did I start....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
