Gross Polluter
08-13-2004, 04:21 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
LOL!
I have no cat and no computer or smog crap and mine still passes!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
jasonp wrote:
>
> So how do you feel about me pulling my cat and smog crap off my Jeep?
> Probably not real happy, huh?
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:JoCdnbnF1Npdh4DcRVn-oQ@speakeasy.net...
> > What you should have learned is to get your polluting wreck fixed instead
> of
> > grousing about it.
> >
> > At ten years old and that many miles it's clear it needs fixing AND you
> drive it
> > too much.
> >
I have no cat and no computer or smog crap and mine still passes!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
jasonp wrote:
>
> So how do you feel about me pulling my cat and smog crap off my Jeep?
> Probably not real happy, huh?
>
> "wkearney99" <wkearney99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:JoCdnbnF1Npdh4DcRVn-oQ@speakeasy.net...
> > What you should have learned is to get your polluting wreck fixed instead
> of
> > grousing about it.
> >
> > At ten years old and that many miles it's clear it needs fixing AND you
> drive it
> > too much.
> >
08-13-2004, 04:26 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
Hi Jeff,
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
08-13-2004, 04:26 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
Hi Jeff,
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
08-13-2004, 04:26 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
Hi Jeff,
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
08-13-2004, 04:26 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
Hi Jeff,
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
CRWLR wrote:
>
> Living in the People's Republic of California has its ups and downs.
> Yesterday was a down, for a while.
>
> The Governor needs to make a yacht payment, so he sent me a vehicle
> registration renewal notice that demands me to make a trip to the local Smog
> Station and support the yachting tastes of those guys. Anyway, they attached
> a host of sensors and probes to my car while making it run a mile or so on a
> treadmill.
>
> The treadmill part of the test seems to have been my undoing. They
> administer this test at two speeds, slow - 15mph - and fast - 25mph. My car
> tripped the Gross Polluter flags and sirens during the low speed run on the
> treadmill, but seemed to make the computers happy - or at least satisfied -
> on the high speed run. The machine spit out a report that detailed the crap
> being spewed from the tail pipe.
>
> The guy administering the test allowed me to take my car out to the freeway
> and get off at the next exit and come back in, where he immediately
> administered the exact same test again, and within minutes of pulling back
> into the repair bay. On the second test, the car passed with flying colors.
> The report that the machine spits out lists the max reading that is allowed,
> and the actual reading that was measured.
>
> Two tests, the first a dismal failure and the second a shining example of
> automotive technology working to keep our skies clean and blue. The ONLY
> difference being a trip around the block, well down the freeway and back to
> the shop. As a Gross Polluter, the NO at low speed tipped the counters at
> 1996, whatever that means. The allowable limit is 695 for this category, so
> my car measured roughly 3 times the allowable limit. After the run around
> the block, this number came in at 130. The high speed test allowed 717, and
> I got 587 as a GP, and 140 on the 2nd test. Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
> are also tested and reported, as a Gross Polluter, these numbers exceeded
> the max allowable by factors of about 3, and when the car passed the numbers
> tiny fractions of the same numbers when the Polluter flag was tripped.
>
> If the car can fail in the low speed test, and pass the high speed test,
> then drive around the block and pass both tests, why don't they do the high
> speed test first so the low speed test has a better chance of passing?
>
> What I learned is that when you take an older car to the Smog ***** for
> yacht payment collections, mine is a '94 with nearly 200,000 miles, maybe
> you should leave it idling in the parking lot before the test is
> administered. I had come in from a 40+ mile commute, but they let the car
> sit for an hour before they got to it, so it cooled off so much that the
> smog stuff was not up to speed during the test.
08-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> Hi Jeff,
> Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
....umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
hang around here?
PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
-Fred W
08-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> Hi Jeff,
> Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
....umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
hang around here?
PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
-Fred W
08-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> Hi Jeff,
> Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
....umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
hang around here?
PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
-Fred W
08-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> Hi Jeff,
> Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
....umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
hang around here?
PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
-Fred W
08-13-2004, 04:42 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Gross Polluter
Ouch, duck fred.
Nick
"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:x76dndW5EZo6uoDcRVn-qg@adelphia.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> > Hi Jeff,
> > Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> > like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> > it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
>
> ...umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
> You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
> hang around here?
>
> PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
>
> -Fred W
>
>
Nick
"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:x76dndW5EZo6uoDcRVn-qg@adelphia.com...
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:411D23E1.72FE1113@***.net...
> > Hi Jeff,
> > Yup, that's what I do, let it idle until my turn comes up, seems
> > like it would load up, but it must keep the catalytic hot enough to do
> > it's job: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
>
> ...umm, Bill. That test was for a '78 Ford Bronco.
> You do actually still own and register a Jeep, don't you? Otherwise, why
> hang around here?
>
> PS - Real Jeeps aren't made by FoMoCo...
>
> -Fred W
>
>