A girlie Liberty question....................
11-18-2004, 10:56 PM
#141
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
"mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
Trac?
According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
is differential type.
11-18-2004, 10:56 PM
#142
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
"mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
Trac?
According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:07 PM
#143
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
What gives you that idea? That would be like saying the Ford
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:07 PM
#144
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
What gives you that idea? That would be like saying the Ford
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:07 PM
#145
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
What gives you that idea? That would be like saying the Ford
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
Factory Experimental Borg Warner Rock Crusher T-10 is weaker than the
T-14 used in Jeeps. Or the Corvette Muncie M-22 is weaker than M465 used
in some Jeep conversions.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:13 PM
#146
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
http://www.newventuregear.com/tcases.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:13 PM
#147
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
http://www.newventuregear.com/tcases.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-18-2004, 11:13 PM
#148
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
http://www.newventuregear.com/tcases.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
irlvnt wrote:
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
11-19-2004, 04:22 AM
#149
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:56:44 UTC "irlvnt"
<thesterns1@NOT4SPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> > So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
> Trac?
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
I can't come up with a direct reference, but it has been posted and I
looked it up on a NV reference site: the 231 has a little higher rated
torque limit than the 242. It's not a huge amount, but the 231 is
definitely speced for higher torque loads.
--
Will Honea
<thesterns1@NOT4SPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> > So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
> Trac?
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
I can't come up with a direct reference, but it has been posted and I
looked it up on a NV reference site: the 231 has a little higher rated
torque limit than the 242. It's not a huge amount, but the 231 is
definitely speced for higher torque loads.
--
Will Honea
11-19-2004, 04:22 AM
#150
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A girlie Liberty question....................
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:56:44 UTC "irlvnt"
<thesterns1@NOT4SPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> > So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
> Trac?
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
I can't come up with a direct reference, but it has been posted and I
looked it up on a NV reference site: the 231 has a little higher rated
torque limit than the 242. It's not a huge amount, but the 231 is
definitely speced for higher torque loads.
--
Will Honea
<thesterns1@NOT4SPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:doOdnfIzUeLqvQDcRVn-2g@gbronline.com...
> > So the Selec-Trac is actually a weaker transfer case than the Command
> Trac?
>
> According to the New Venture Gear numbering scheme, the SelecTrac
> is stronger than a CommandTrac. It is a 242, vs a 231. The first 2
> indicates 2 range, the second number is strength, and the third number
> is differential type.
I can't come up with a direct reference, but it has been posted and I
looked it up on a NV reference site: the 231 has a little higher rated
torque limit than the 242. It's not a huge amount, but the 231 is
definitely speced for higher torque loads.
--
Will Honea