Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
daily self abuse :-)
Dave "Twin SUs" Milne
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"RJ" <re_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gafmk0h6lgvif317ujfmad8uegaed0ob8q@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
> >the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
> >day.
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
>
> RJ
Dave "Twin SUs" Milne
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"RJ" <re_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gafmk0h6lgvif317ujfmad8uegaed0ob8q@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
> >the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
> >day.
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
>
> RJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
Those that want to go fast:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
Those that want to go fast:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
Those that want to go fast:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...r_bigpicture2/ that do not
have to comply with SMOG regulations.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> I have stayed away from this discussion for as long as I can.
>
> Why in Hell would anybody want to take off a fuel injection system in favor
> of a carburator?
>
> I just can't get over the feeling you guys are making a giant leap
> backwards. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
RJ proclaimed:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
RJ proclaimed:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
RJ proclaimed:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:49:25 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, I for one actually 'like' getting under there and tweaking up
>>the carb so it just purrs or thumps depending on what I want to do that
>>day.
>
>
> Getting a reluctant carburetor to work right is self-abuse.
Yeah, but Mike would probably be the first guy I'd expect to do a
conversion to SU carbs and Lucas electrics on his jeep....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:49:25 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:49:25 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Getting Rid of Computer in Current TJ (without engine swap)
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:49:25 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
wrote:
>
> I have even priced out points style distributors for mine so I can get
> rid of all the engine electronics! Man when you are over 100 miles from
> the nearest parts and 30 or more from phone service, it is so nice to
> have things you can just trail fix.
Ah, yes... blow an ignition module and you ARE going to walk to get
the replacement while on several occasions my old Dodge PU came home
with a piece of cardboard isolating one of the pair of dual points.
Redundancy and simplicity built in. Of course, it would be nice if
you had a carb built to that same standard but about all the ones
produced in recent years have so much crap hung on them (by gov't fiat
or for exoctic performance) that they can barely perform their basic
function of delivering a combustible mixture to the cylinders when
they ARE working right.
And a decent toolkit was a hammer, a screwdriver, a pair of pliers and
one roll of bailing wire. I guess that nowadays you would also have
to add a roll of duct tape, tho <g>.
--
Will Honea
