gears ot tires
12-06-2006, 08:14 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
No, the wider tire footprint tends to "float" on the snow. The slightly
narrower footprint digs in for better traction.
Tom
<Thoth1126@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165423138.071875.35990@73g2000cwn.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > The loss of traction because of the
> wider tire was Very noticeable and very disappointing now that we are
> stuck with them. These wider tires spin way too easy off a start in
> the
> snow. They also lose traction 5 or 10 mph slower than the p225's did
>
> Woah - conflict of my internal nature!! Bigger footprint = more
> traction no?
>
narrower footprint digs in for better traction.
Tom
<Thoth1126@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165423138.071875.35990@73g2000cwn.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > The loss of traction because of the
> wider tire was Very noticeable and very disappointing now that we are
> stuck with them. These wider tires spin way too easy off a start in
> the
> snow. They also lose traction 5 or 10 mph slower than the p225's did
>
> Woah - conflict of my internal nature!! Bigger footprint = more
> traction no?
>
12-06-2006, 08:14 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
No, the wider tire footprint tends to "float" on the snow. The slightly
narrower footprint digs in for better traction.
Tom
<Thoth1126@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165423138.071875.35990@73g2000cwn.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > The loss of traction because of the
> wider tire was Very noticeable and very disappointing now that we are
> stuck with them. These wider tires spin way too easy off a start in
> the
> snow. They also lose traction 5 or 10 mph slower than the p225's did
>
> Woah - conflict of my internal nature!! Bigger footprint = more
> traction no?
>
narrower footprint digs in for better traction.
Tom
<Thoth1126@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165423138.071875.35990@73g2000cwn.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > The loss of traction because of the
> wider tire was Very noticeable and very disappointing now that we are
> stuck with them. These wider tires spin way too easy off a start in
> the
> snow. They also lose traction 5 or 10 mph slower than the p225's did
>
> Woah - conflict of my internal nature!! Bigger footprint = more
> traction no?
>
12-07-2006, 06:01 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
12-07-2006, 06:01 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
12-07-2006, 06:01 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
Merrill
Thoth1126@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Mike - it makes sense. As soon as I read "dig in and bite" I
> thought of the old Army jeeps and their skinny tires and then I read
> further down about them!
> Good info.
12-07-2006, 09:17 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
merrill wrote:
> Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
>
> I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
> tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
> highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
> less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
They're also less expensive and offer less rolling resistance, yielding
better fuel mileage. Skinny tires are underrated; everyone wants huge,
fat tires these days because it looks cool, not because they DO anything
special.
> Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
>
> I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
> tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
> highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
> less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
They're also less expensive and offer less rolling resistance, yielding
better fuel mileage. Skinny tires are underrated; everyone wants huge,
fat tires these days because it looks cool, not because they DO anything
special.
12-07-2006, 09:17 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: gears ot tires
merrill wrote:
> Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
>
> I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
> tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
> highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
> less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
They're also less expensive and offer less rolling resistance, yielding
better fuel mileage. Skinny tires are underrated; everyone wants huge,
fat tires these days because it looks cool, not because they DO anything
special.
> Another reason to use narrower tires for cummuting:
>
> I like the luggy, skinny tires for all weather driving. The narrow
> tires are less prone to hydroplaning when you hit a big puddle at
> highway speeds. And you would find that they dig in better and plow
> less when turning in snow especially when braking in turns.
They're also less expensive and offer less rolling resistance, yielding
better fuel mileage. Skinny tires are underrated; everyone wants huge,
fat tires these days because it looks cool, not because they DO anything
special.
