Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:28:06 -0500, "James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:28:06 -0500, "James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:28:06 -0500, "James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:28:06 -0500, "James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
wrote:
>Thanks Bill. The thermostat was bought from NAPA, and specified for this
>vehicle. 4.7 engine.
As I said in the other group, it could be defective, but it just
sounds to me like my experience with a stock radiator that was a
little too small for the engine.
Dan
>
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for this
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for this
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for this
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for this
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
?????
Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
time................................. are you ???
Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
--james--
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Followup-- 2000 JGC V-8 still overheating
Hi James,
If your coolant stayed in for more than the recommended time, sediment
would attach to the core, that only a rod out would fix.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com> wrote in message
news:AMudnWg3vK-FNDTYnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for
this
> engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
> ?????
>
> Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
> time................................. are you ???
>
>
> Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
>
>
> --james--
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
If your coolant stayed in for more than the recommended time, sediment
would attach to the core, that only a rod out would fix.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"James" <jnipperxxx@nospamfdn.com> wrote in message
news:AMudnWg3vK-FNDTYnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Dan, if the "stock" radiator in this Jeep is just a bit too small for
this
> engine, why do you think it never overheated in the first 125,000 miles
> ?????
>
> Surely, you are not suggesting that the radiator shrunk a bit during this
> time................................. are you ???
>
>
> Respectfully, I don't quite see your logic..........
>
>
> --james--
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com