Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
"Jerry" <joe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:besre0dah0061hmdj5k1e7u8stjevg64jb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:18:01 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
> >GNP per capita...look up Bill's link.
>
> And you expect me to belive anything on the CIA's fact book, when
> I've already noted some serious errors with it.. Even their own
> numbers don't add up..
>
> The CIA's factbook however lists GDP rather then GNP for each
> country, and also noted that the United States is not #1 on that
> list..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>"hen again, did the CIA not also claim that Iraq has WMD"
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>"hen again, did the CIA not also claim that Iraq has WMD"
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>"hen again, did the CIA not also claim that Iraq has WMD"
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>"hen again, did the CIA not also claim that Iraq has WMD"
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
>and I suppose you beleive that they did not have them... and you claim
>you are not a liberal???
.... And where are they since they said they knew where they were? ...
.... Not "WHEN" they were..
And No I'm not a liberal.. No one is %100 liberal or %100
conservative.. On some issues I'm conservative, on some issues I'm
liberal, on other issues I don't agree with either view point.. Those
who claim to be one or the other are just ignorant..
Unless of course you can prove anything I've said thus far in this
group to be wrong..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
They take great pride in leaving their buildings all shoot up as
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
They take great pride in leaving their buildings all shoot up as
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
They take great pride in leaving their buildings all shoot up as
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
the were in W.W. II.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Typo on my part, I meant GDP. And I stand corrected, Luxembourg has a higher
> per capita GDP by $63 per year in 2002, with a smaller population than
> Little Rock, Arkansas. Wonder what the pollution is like in Luxembourg.
>
> http://www.mrdowling.com/800gdppercapita.html
>
> I'm all for being skeptical at what you find on the net...the CIA oil
> rankings are obviously typos. Doesn't mean it's all wrong.
