Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40EDCB7B.A8DB48FA@***.net...
> German pollution kills half the Black forest:
> http://www2.corvallis.k12.or.us/chs/...k%20Forest.htm
America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40EDCB7B.A8DB48FA@***.net...
> German pollution kills half the Black forest:
> http://www2.corvallis.k12.or.us/chs/...k%20Forest.htm
America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40EDCB7B.A8DB48FA@***.net...
> German pollution kills half the Black forest:
> http://www2.corvallis.k12.or.us/chs/...k%20Forest.htm
America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
> Yup, that's what I was try to say to rebut, Markus' all Mercedes.
Bill,
I'm speaking for Switzerland mostly, Matt and Ted aren't. Town cars and
Ford Victoras are very rare species, here.
Markus
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel engines: better low-end torque?
>America is still the biggest polluter per head of population in the world,
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.
>and that doesn't include the big chemical companies that have located
>themselves in under developed countries becuase they have no polution laws.
Facts mean nothing unless bill accepts them as truth.