Re: consensus on new commander?
 

In article <45195B26.D4CC53C7@sympatico.ca>,
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Bill Kearney wrote:
>>
>> > A few other familiar names that Studebaker used first...
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> At least it is more or less on topic unlike most of the -------- posted
>here these days.

ROFLMAO! Exactly. It's a welcome change to read the Studebaker OT and how
it was similiar to the topic.


--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...

Re: consensus on new commander?
 

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:21:49 GMT, "griffin" <gryffy@WEEEEshaw.ca>
wrote:

>I actually don't have one ...I didn't test the download before posting the
>link - sorry. A google search should yield a different link that works.



Try this link. Canyonero is about 1/2 way down.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebu.../simpson2.html

Re: consensus on new commander?
 

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:21:49 GMT, "griffin" <gryffy@WEEEEshaw.ca>
wrote:

>I actually don't have one ...I didn't test the download before posting the
>link - sorry. A google search should yield a different link that works.



Try this link. Canyonero is about 1/2 way down.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebu.../simpson2.html

Re: consensus on new commander?
 

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:21:49 GMT, "griffin" <gryffy@WEEEEshaw.ca>
wrote:

>I actually don't have one ...I didn't test the download before posting the
>link - sorry. A google search should yield a different link that works.



Try this link. Canyonero is about 1/2 way down.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebu.../simpson2.html