Bring back the Brat or modernize the Wrangler
Guest
Posts: n/a
Matt Mead wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
Guest
Posts: n/a
Matt Mead wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
Guest
Posts: n/a
Matt Mead wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:06 GMT, Rob Munach <xlengr@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I owned a 1987 BRAT for 9 years. Definitely one of the best vehicles I
>>have ever owned. It went off road really well although I wouldn't use it
>>for the Rubicon trail. It had a part-time two speed shift on the fly
>>transfer case with the hubs permanently locked. It also has adjustable
>>height torsion bars on the rear and adjustable height struts on the
>>front. Crap, the thing also had a gear driven cam and hydraulic lifters.
>>No maintenance at all. I kind of miss it. It was also was waaay better
>>lookin than the Baja. Mine didn't have the jump seats so the bed was
>>usable. I actually was able to put a Gold Wing back there.
>
>
>
> What is the t-case ratio in low-range? I've always wondered.....
>
> Matt
> 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Don't know, but it ain't 4:1!
--
Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com...
trailer out of the back yard.
>
> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com...
trailer out of the back yard.
>
> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com...
trailer out of the back yard.
>
> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:37:21 -0500, "Tim" <jeeps@kear.tds.net> wrote:
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:37:21 -0500, "Tim" <jeeps@kear.tds.net> wrote:
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:37:21 -0500, "Tim" <jeeps@kear.tds.net> wrote:
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry
>
>"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:265511pto5s2rm1mbjnflf6876hn7h7r8i@4ax.com.. .
> trailer out of the back yard.
>>
>> On the Cape Cod National Seashore I need 4wd low on occasion. If I
>> never needed it, I'd be tempted to take the OBW out there.
>
>drop the pressure in all four tires to about 8 psi. much better traction,
>with slightly less clearance, for sand running.
I know. <G>
There are sections where tight turns are necessary and 4WD low is
still very necessary. The OBW would definitely get stuck.
Barry


