bouncy front end
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
Might tell that to a pre runner:
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
Might tell that to a pre runner:
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
Might tell that to a pre runner:
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
http://www.race-dezert.com/motion/unsorted/tt66b.mpg Doesn't any of your
shop volunteer for the Baja Score 1000?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Coasty, the clueless Bill is now recommending double-shock steering
> stabilizers... which anyone with serious offroad experience would have
> known that all double-shocking does is cause the power steering pump to
> work twice as hard when steering and likely boil over on a tough trail.
> Plus they simply place more stress on the front-end steering
> components to overcome not only the big tire's increased steering effort
> but the doubled resistance to steering input caused by the
> double-shocked steering stabilizer. Street cruisers or offroad
> wannabees run double-shocked stabilizers because they look cool but only
> those running HUGE tires like 38 or 40" and bigger really need
> double-shocked stabilizers. No, they're not likely to cause the power
> steering fluid to boil over on the street, the comparatively tiny
> (compared to what is common today) tires Bill used on his CJ, or on a
> gentle trail because there are not the number of repetitive tight turns
> as there is on a really tough trail.
>
> Seeing a Jeep with normal trail-size (like up to 35" or 37" tires on
> the trail with a double-shocked stabilizer is generally a good clue the
> driver doesn't really aware of the problems that such a stabilizer can
> cause. A single normal heavy-duty shocked stabilizer like is sold by a
> dozen offroad companies is fine... double shocked steering stabilizers
> are just a bad idea for the majority of us.
>
> Bill, you're so short on actual relative trail experience that it's not
> even funny. The last photo you posted showing your CJ offroad looks
> like it was taken with a Kodak Brownie camera.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > You're just telling me you don't have oversized tires on your car.
> > If you want to stop a shimmy replace the dampener or even double shock
> > it: http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Coasty wrote:
> >
> >>Well I am new to news groups and boy what action. I was trying to remain
> >>neutral but I just can't after ciphering through the entire thread, Bill I
> >>do not know you but you are wrong both in attitude and conduct unbecoming.
> >>Also, some bad or should I say some miss leading info on the front end
> >>stabilizer. I have been driving 4x4 and have had a jeep of over 35 years
> >>and if it goes bad you won't even know it.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Coasty
> >>Semper Paratus
> >>(Always Ready)
> >>
> >>"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> >>news:428B88E1.ED420C06@***.net...
> >>| I don't waste my time being politically correct, I won't lie for
> >>| anyone! I leave that for the weak bleeding heart liberals, which at
> >>| present rate won't be political much longer.
> >>| God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>| mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>|
> >>| Tom Greening wrote:
> >>| >
> >>| > I see in the below he specifies that his "-----" comment was directed at
> >>| > female LEOs and not Drifter. Gee, my apologies Bill, that makes it
> >>sooo
> >>| > much better. Do you even realize how laughably ignorant, sexist, and
> >>down
> >>| > right stupid that makes you look?
> >>| >
> >>| > As far as reading comprehension goes, check the mirror bub. I
> >>comprehend
> >>| > just fine. You called SOMEone a ----- and I pointed it out, and you
> >>turn
> >>| > around and tell me I can't comprehend what I read because your comment
> >>was
> >>| > made about women and not Drifter. Here's a newsflash for you
> >>Bill....uhm,
> >>| > you know, women are people too. I never said that is what you called
> >>| > Drifter .
> >>| >
> >>| > That's ok though, you just keep right on ranting away because with every
> >>| > stab at the keyboard you show yourself more and more for the kind of
> >>person
> >>| > you really are.
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
So send me a picture with yours missing, I want to confirm your
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
So send me a picture with yours missing, I want to confirm your
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
So send me a picture with yours missing, I want to confirm your
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OFF TOPIC Re: bouncy front end
So send me a picture with yours missing, I want to confirm your
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
stupidly.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Not to mention that a "shimmy" is NEVER (!) caused by a defective
> steering stabilizer. Installing a new or bigger steering stabilizer to
> correct a shimmy is just plain wrong... you masked the symptom but you
> didn't cure the actual cause. I have no doubt that you made people pay
> you for blatantly wrong repairs like that when you ran your gas station.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> I shouldn't Brian but it'd hurt Jeeping if those new to Jeeps just
> accepted everything he said at face value.
