BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
blew by me and he flipped me off.
Nick
"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com...
> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
Jeff:
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
Jeff:
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
Jeff:
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
Jeff:
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
I have 31 x 10.5 x 15 BFG All Terrain TA's on my '02 TJ. They go great in
the snow.
Check out front and rear view photos of the TJ in snow up to the axels. Went
right through, with no problems. Was hard packed, frozen dirt under about 8"
to 10" of snow. No other vehicles had been on this road before me, so I made
LOTS of tracks (heh, heh.)
alt.binaries.pictures.autos.4x4.
See "Jeep TJ snow front" and "Jeep TJ snow rear" posts which I just sent.
Sometimes winter IS fun!
That being said, I do believe that BFG MT's or Goodyear MT's would go better
in deep snow, although I have no experience with these tires to back this
assumption up.
Tom
snip
> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>
> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
towing a
> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
performace
> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
I
> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
this
> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
AT's gave
> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
sticky
> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
say
> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
that
> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
> >
> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
snow?
> >Deep snow?
> >
> >-jeff
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
What kind of trail were you on that you encountered a Geo Tracker?
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
What kind of trail were you on that you encountered a Geo Tracker?
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: BFG AT's or MT's better in snow?
What kind of trail were you on that you encountered a Geo Tracker?
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
Sure it wasn't a mall parking lot or something? ;)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:42:22 -0700, "Nick N" <nnote@despammed.com>
wrote:
>I was doing a trail once about 8 inches of fresh snow with my AT's. They
>packed so badly, I could barely get my jeep to move. A freakin Geo tracker
>blew by me and he flipped me off.
>Nick
>
>"hankfox" <hankfox@comcast.unnecessary.net> wrote in message
>news:1e3580d4o6nhjimr2m5lju440gct8c3fn8@4ax.com.. .
>> Jeff, I run 31x10.5's and have absolutely no qualms about my BFG
>> AT/KO's . I took into account the fact that the TJ is also my everyday
>> transportation, and was concerned about added highway noise and the
>> potential for lower tread life. I think I decided on the AT's since I
>> didn't need any of the additional strengths of the MT.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2004 07:05:24 GMT, handywired@aol.com (Handywired) wrote:
>>
>> >My AT's, on my TJ, handled snowy elk camp great last year, including
>towing a
>> >trailer back OUT on icy snow-packed roads. I was pleased with their
>performace
>> >on snow. However, I regeared to 4.10 and want to go to at least 31's, so
>I
>> >need to buy tires, and so I am trying to figure out if I should go MT
>this
>> >time, or AT again. There were times, here in western Oregon, that my
>AT's gave
>> >me pause. These would have been the times I contemplated trying deep
>sticky
>> >mud. MT's would be much better for that, I am told, though let me also
>say
>> >that I am not a fan of mud and what it does to vehicles (or trails for
>that
>> >matter), so any serious mud use would be mostly out of neccesity.
>> >
>> >Are MT's at least as good at AT's on snow packed roads? How about "raw"
>snow?
>> >Deep snow?
>> >
>> >-jeff
>>
>
