back
07-23-2003, 09:21 AM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
Although I wouldn't have said it as forcefully as Jeff did, I must agree
with some of his points. When I read the first post from Nathan saying he
was back in North Carolina, I couldn't believe it. I had to read and re-read
the post to be sure I was reading it correctly.
To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles only to
turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to me.
What the heck!! How can you and your wife decide not to go just the few more
miles because of truck problems, which have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with
the new location, new job, new city, new state, new home, new life out west,
etc.?
Seems like the sensible and logical thing to do would have been to continue
the last few miles and "stick it out" rather than turn around and drive
another 2500 miles back to NC. If the truck could make it 2500 miles back
to NC, it could also have made it the few more miles to your original
destination. Seems like trying out the new location and new job for a year
or so would have been the sensible, logical, and adult thing to do.
I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like it.
Also, it does seem like whenever Nathan is here, the entire newsgroup
revolves around Nathan and his problems.
Tom
"Jeffrey Leonard" <jeffl@quasi.net> wrote in message
news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
SNIP
> >
> What a ------- LOSER you are. Whenever you're here you make this whole
> newsgroup revolve around you and your lame, stupid problems. Waaaah!
> Chrysler's suing me! Waaaaah! Uhaul gave me an obviously ----ed up truck
> but I didn't want to suck it up and do it right! Waaaaaaaah! You cheap,
> dumb, ------- bastard! What you put your wife through to save a few
> bucks and do it your self!
>
> You could have paid a REAL moving company but NOOOOOOOOO...
>
> Don't blame the return on her. YOU wanted to go back. The smart thing
> would have been to say "Honey, we made it this far. We gotta stick it
> out." That's what hardy pionerrs would have done.
>
> But you chickened out. Your wife puts up with all your childish
> --------. All the crap you spring on her and she lets you. But now SHE
> is the one to blame for your return? Eventually one day she'll wise up.
> Now get the ---- out of here. I want to read about Jeeps, not the latest
> god damned Nathan Collier soap opera.
>
>
with some of his points. When I read the first post from Nathan saying he
was back in North Carolina, I couldn't believe it. I had to read and re-read
the post to be sure I was reading it correctly.
To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles only to
turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to me.
What the heck!! How can you and your wife decide not to go just the few more
miles because of truck problems, which have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with
the new location, new job, new city, new state, new home, new life out west,
etc.?
Seems like the sensible and logical thing to do would have been to continue
the last few miles and "stick it out" rather than turn around and drive
another 2500 miles back to NC. If the truck could make it 2500 miles back
to NC, it could also have made it the few more miles to your original
destination. Seems like trying out the new location and new job for a year
or so would have been the sensible, logical, and adult thing to do.
I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like it.
Also, it does seem like whenever Nathan is here, the entire newsgroup
revolves around Nathan and his problems.
Tom
"Jeffrey Leonard" <jeffl@quasi.net> wrote in message
news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
SNIP
> >
> What a ------- LOSER you are. Whenever you're here you make this whole
> newsgroup revolve around you and your lame, stupid problems. Waaaah!
> Chrysler's suing me! Waaaaah! Uhaul gave me an obviously ----ed up truck
> but I didn't want to suck it up and do it right! Waaaaaaaah! You cheap,
> dumb, ------- bastard! What you put your wife through to save a few
> bucks and do it your self!
>
> You could have paid a REAL moving company but NOOOOOOOOO...
>
> Don't blame the return on her. YOU wanted to go back. The smart thing
> would have been to say "Honey, we made it this far. We gotta stick it
> out." That's what hardy pionerrs would have done.
>
> But you chickened out. Your wife puts up with all your childish
> --------. All the crap you spring on her and she lets you. But now SHE
> is the one to blame for your return? Eventually one day she'll wise up.
> Now get the ---- out of here. I want to read about Jeeps, not the latest
> god damned Nathan Collier soap opera.
>
>
07-23-2003, 10:31 AM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
"mabar" <mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> wrote in message
news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> Also, it does seem like whenever Nathan is here, the entire newsgroup
> revolves around Nathan and his problems.
in three years and thousands of posts ive helped each and every time ive had
valid content to contribute, as well as tried to make things "fun" along the
way. its a shame you only seem to have seen me discuss daimler and uhaul.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> Also, it does seem like whenever Nathan is here, the entire newsgroup
> revolves around Nathan and his problems.
in three years and thousands of posts ive helped each and every time ive had
valid content to contribute, as well as tried to make things "fun" along the
way. its a shame you only seem to have seen me discuss daimler and uhaul.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
07-23-2003, 10:49 AM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
"mabar" <mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> wrote in message
news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles only
to
> turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to me.
thanks tom. http://home.nc.rr.com/hardcorejeep/montana/uhaul.jpg
> I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
> about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like it.
<sigh>. im busted. youve analyzed me and figured me out. i guess being
away from the drugs, crime, and humidity were to much for me afterall.
thanks for helping me figure it all out. *-(
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles only
to
> turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to me.
thanks tom. http://home.nc.rr.com/hardcorejeep/montana/uhaul.jpg
> I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
> about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like it.
<sigh>. im busted. youve analyzed me and figured me out. i guess being
away from the drugs, crime, and humidity were to much for me afterall.
thanks for helping me figure it all out. *-(
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
07-23-2003, 10:51 AM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
"Jeffrey Leonard" <jeffl@quasi.net> wrote in message
news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
> What a ------- LOSER you are.
wow......and youre not a very nice guy. i think id rather be _everything_
you accuse me of being than to conduct myself as you have. i hope youre
proud.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
> What a ------- LOSER you are.
wow......and youre not a very nice guy. i think id rather be _everything_
you accuse me of being than to conduct myself as you have. i hope youre
proud.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
07-23-2003, 10:56 AM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
>it does seem like whenever Nathan is here, the entire newsgroup
>> revolves around Nathan and his problems.
>"Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>its a shame you only seem to have seen me discuss daimler and uhaul.
Nathan,
Sorry about your misfortune. Hope things go better in the future. I also hope
you will take some advice from an old fart as constructive:
Your "adventure" with Chrysler affected all of us, and many of us tried to
help, but you wouldn't (or couldn't) take our advice to retain counsel which
had disasterous results for you. When you decided to move to cowboy country
many questioned your decision to use U-Haul and kindly suggested that it was a
false economy. Again, you wouldn't (or couldn't) take that advice with a bad
result.
Perhaps that is why your return to the newsgroup is receiving a negative
reaction from some quarters. It's probably best to keep personal issues off
the newsgroup and stick to jeeping. (You can always discuss personal things
privately with the friends you meet here.)
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.RobertBills.com
>> revolves around Nathan and his problems.
>"Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>its a shame you only seem to have seen me discuss daimler and uhaul.
Nathan,
Sorry about your misfortune. Hope things go better in the future. I also hope
you will take some advice from an old fart as constructive:
Your "adventure" with Chrysler affected all of us, and many of us tried to
help, but you wouldn't (or couldn't) take our advice to retain counsel which
had disasterous results for you. When you decided to move to cowboy country
many questioned your decision to use U-Haul and kindly suggested that it was a
false economy. Again, you wouldn't (or couldn't) take that advice with a bad
result.
Perhaps that is why your return to the newsgroup is receiving a negative
reaction from some quarters. It's probably best to keep personal issues off
the newsgroup and stick to jeeping. (You can always discuss personal things
privately with the friends you meet here.)
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.RobertBills.com
07-23-2003, 11:55 AM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
Nathan:
I think the word "unbelievable" was the wrong word for me to use. I DO
believe that this all happened to you. Please change the word
"unbelievable" to "not understandable."
I still can't understand how turning around and driving 2500 miles back to
NC, was a better choice than driving the relatively few more miles to your
original destination.
Tom
"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ngxTa.282969$_w.10747990@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> "mabar" <mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> wrote in message
> news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> > To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles
only
> to
> > turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to
me.
>
> thanks tom. http://home.nc.rr.com/hardcorejeep/montana/uhaul.jpg
>
> > I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
> > about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like
it.
>
> <sigh>. im busted. youve analyzed me and figured me out. i guess being
> away from the drugs, crime, and humidity were to much for me afterall.
> thanks for helping me figure it all out. *-(
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
>
>
I think the word "unbelievable" was the wrong word for me to use. I DO
believe that this all happened to you. Please change the word
"unbelievable" to "not understandable."
I still can't understand how turning around and driving 2500 miles back to
NC, was a better choice than driving the relatively few more miles to your
original destination.
Tom
"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ngxTa.282969$_w.10747990@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> "mabar" <mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> wrote in message
> news:QH6dnfYHI51DFoOiU-KYvA@gbronline.com...
> > To pack up your entire family and possessions, then drive 2500 miles
only
> to
> > turn around just a few miles from your destination is UNBELIEVABLE to
me.
>
> thanks tom. http://home.nc.rr.com/hardcorejeep/montana/uhaul.jpg
>
> > I think there were underlying issues about the move that we don't know
> > about. Did Nathan and his wife REALLY want to move? Doesn't seem like
it.
>
> <sigh>. im busted. youve analyzed me and figured me out. i guess being
> away from the drugs, crime, and humidity were to much for me afterall.
> thanks for helping me figure it all out. *-(
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
>
>
07-23-2003, 12:07 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
"mabar" <mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> wrote in message
news:d7ednWNQ8t-ZLYOiXTWJgA@gbronline.com...
> I still can't understand how turning around and driving 2500 miles back to
> NC, was a better choice than driving the relatively few more miles to your
> original destination.
nor can i, but that is what the wife _really_ wanted so i made it happen.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:d7ednWNQ8t-ZLYOiXTWJgA@gbronline.com...
> I still can't understand how turning around and driving 2500 miles back to
> NC, was a better choice than driving the relatively few more miles to your
> original destination.
nor can i, but that is what the wife _really_ wanted so i made it happen.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
07-23-2003, 12:46 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
"Nathan W. Collier" <abuse@aol.com> wrote in message
news:thxTa.282970$_w.10748084@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> "Jeffrey Leonard" <jeffl@quasi.net> wrote in message
> news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
> > What a ------- LOSER you are.
>
> wow......and youre not a very nice guy. i think id rather be _everything_
> you accuse me of being than to conduct myself as you have. i hope youre
> proud.
>
Amen to that! (Gosh I hope this is the end of this thread.)
Earle
news:thxTa.282970$_w.10748084@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> "Jeffrey Leonard" <jeffl@quasi.net> wrote in message
> news:bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net...
> > What a ------- LOSER you are.
>
> wow......and youre not a very nice guy. i think id rather be _everything_
> you accuse me of being than to conduct myself as you have. i hope youre
> proud.
>
Amen to that! (Gosh I hope this is the end of this thread.)
Earle
07-23-2003, 03:17 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the whining loser is back
This from a loser whom hasn't the ***** to use she real name for
this troll. Forwarded to abuse@news.alt.net for charter language
violation.
Path:
news1.central.***.net!central.***.net!east.***.net !peer01.***.net!***.net!news-xfer.***.net!news.lightlink.com!news.alt.net!usene t
From:
Jeffrey Leonard <jeffl@quasi.net>
Newsgroups:
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Subject:
Re: the whining loser is back
Date:
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:02:42 -0700
Organization:
Organization, Schmorganization
Lines:
122
Message-ID:
<bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net>
References:
<b_dTa.335124$jp.8774928@twister.southeast.rr.co m>
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311
X-Accept-Language:
en-us, en
In-Reply-To:
<b_dTa.335124$jp.8774928@twister.southeast.rr.co m>
Xref:
east.***.net
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******:471327
X-Received-Date:
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:02:43 EDT
(news1.central.***.net)
--
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>
> What a ------- LOSER you are. Whenever you're here you make this whole
> newsgroup revolve around you and your lame, stupid problems. Waaaah!
> Chrysler's suing me! Waaaaah! Uhaul gave me an obviously ----ed up truck
> but I didn't want to suck it up and do it right! Waaaaaaaah! You cheap,
> dumb, ------- bastard! What you put your wife through to save a few
> bucks and do it your self!
>
> You could have paid a REAL moving company but NOOOOOOOOO...
>
> Don't blame the return on her. YOU wanted to go back. The smart thing
> would have been to say "Honey, we made it this far. We gotta stick it
> out." That's what hardy pionerrs would have done.
>
> But you chickened out. Your wife puts up with all your childish
> --------. All the crap you spring on her and she lets you. But now SHE
> is the one to blame for your return? Eventually one day she'll wise up.
> Now get the ---- out of here. I want to read about Jeeps, not the latest
> god damned Nathan Collier soap opera.
this troll. Forwarded to abuse@news.alt.net for charter language
violation.
Path:
news1.central.***.net!central.***.net!east.***.net !peer01.***.net!***.net!news-xfer.***.net!news.lightlink.com!news.alt.net!usene t
From:
Jeffrey Leonard <jeffl@quasi.net>
Newsgroups:
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
Subject:
Re: the whining loser is back
Date:
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:02:42 -0700
Organization:
Organization, Schmorganization
Lines:
122
Message-ID:
<bfl8e3$qm7$0@pita.alt.net>
References:
<b_dTa.335124$jp.8774928@twister.southeast.rr.co m>
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311
X-Accept-Language:
en-us, en
In-Reply-To:
<b_dTa.335124$jp.8774928@twister.southeast.rr.co m>
Xref:
east.***.net
rec.autos.makers.jeep+******:471327
X-Received-Date:
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:02:43 EDT
(news1.central.***.net)
--
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey Leonard wrote:
>
> What a ------- LOSER you are. Whenever you're here you make this whole
> newsgroup revolve around you and your lame, stupid problems. Waaaah!
> Chrysler's suing me! Waaaaah! Uhaul gave me an obviously ----ed up truck
> but I didn't want to suck it up and do it right! Waaaaaaaah! You cheap,
> dumb, ------- bastard! What you put your wife through to save a few
> bucks and do it your self!
>
> You could have paid a REAL moving company but NOOOOOOOOO...
>
> Don't blame the return on her. YOU wanted to go back. The smart thing
> would have been to say "Honey, we made it this far. We gotta stick it
> out." That's what hardy pionerrs would have done.
>
> But you chickened out. Your wife puts up with all your childish
> --------. All the crap you spring on her and she lets you. But now SHE
> is the one to blame for your return? Eventually one day she'll wise up.
> Now get the ---- out of here. I want to read about Jeeps, not the latest
> god damned Nathan Collier soap opera.