The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and the
symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
confusion.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:427425B9.939B8FE7@***.net...
> The only example I have of a locker releasing is of Jennifer's
> rear, now do you think just because it's up front it will act
> differently, while it's on the ground?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> (a) Ox isn't vacuum lock, it's mechanically actuated via cable. (b) Let
>> me
>> clarify, are you talking about the rear axle, or front? Because the
>> orginal
>> post in the thread was regarding front axles, not rear, and you told him
>> to
>> "use a spool."

 

Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
our time!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and the
> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
> confusion.

 

Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
our time!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and the
> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
> confusion.

 

Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
our time!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and the
> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
> confusion.

 

Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
our time!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and the
> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
> confusion.

 

Mr. Irrelevent strikes again.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42744A8B.7B6A06C0@***.net...
> Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
> elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
> understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
> helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
> our time!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and
>> the
>> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
>> confusion.

 

Mr. Irrelevent strikes again.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42744A8B.7B6A06C0@***.net...
> Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
> elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
> understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
> helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
> our time!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and
>> the
>> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
>> confusion.

 

Mr. Irrelevent strikes again.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42744A8B.7B6A06C0@***.net...
> Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
> elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
> understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
> helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
> our time!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and
>> the
>> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
>> confusion.

 

Mr. Irrelevent strikes again.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42744A8B.7B6A06C0@***.net...
> Matt, are you smart enough to follow this thread up to where Jeff,
> elaborated on my front spool? Maybe, if you read Jeff's posted YOU would
> understand, but I doubt it. And as usual YOU haven't written anything
> helpful for Don Bowman's Spring Over Axle, where I have. Quit wasting
> our time!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The topic was regarding front lockers, you brought up a rear spool and
>> the
>> symptoms of a detroit in the rear. Irrelevent to the OP, hence the
>> confusion.

 

And that was relevant?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Mr. Irrelevent strikes again.