Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.
It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?
>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Just Taylor
Jeep Mailing List
4
04-25-2005 02:24 PM
Doug
Jeep Mailing List
8
06-18-2004 07:44 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)