AMC engine swap
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AMC engine swap
Johnny U via CarKB.com wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AMC engine swap
Johnny U via CarKB.com wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: AMC engine swap
Johnny U via CarKB.com wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
>>Johnny, keep in mind the Jeep 4.0 is an updated version of your 232 and
>>ought to pretty much bolt right in.
>>
>>I've long thought a fun project would be a Gremlin X with a Jeep 4.0,
>>little bugger would MOVE!
>>
[...]
>
> Yea thats what I keep hearing and one of the reasons I am even thinking about
> the swap. A Gremlin with a 4.0 I would not want to be in front of you in the
> fast lane.
I wouldn't want to be next to it on a bumpy road. The Gremlin had less
than nothing for weight over the rear axle and it was easy to get one
sidewise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
