|
Re: almost stolen!
it should be...
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com... > In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>, > "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX. > > No, it's not. > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
it should be...
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message news:moomesa-B8B5D7.20053723122003@corp.newsfeeds.com... > In article <vj6Gb.17053$Pg1.7624@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>, > "Terry Jeffrey" <twjeffrey@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX. > > No, it's not. > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com... > In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net> > wrote: > > > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot > > someone trespassing on your property after dark. > > No. Trespassing is not enough. > > TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49 > > PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is > justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or > tangible, movable property: > (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under > Section 9.41; and > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly > force is immediately necessary: > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, > robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal > mischief during the nighttime; or > (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing > burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime > from escaping with the property; and > (3) he reasonably believes that: > (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by > any other means; or > (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover > the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial > risk of death or serious bodily injury. > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com... > In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net> > wrote: > > > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot > > someone trespassing on your property after dark. > > No. Trespassing is not enough. > > TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49 > > PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is > justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or > tangible, movable property: > (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under > Section 9.41; and > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly > force is immediately necessary: > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, > robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal > mischief during the nighttime; or > (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing > burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime > from escaping with the property; and > (3) he reasonably believes that: > (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by > any other means; or > (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover > the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial > risk of death or serious bodily injury. > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
didn't we go over all this just a few weeks ago???
"Jeepers" <moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote in message news:moomesa-2A559F.14572123122003@corp.newsfeeds.com... > In article <eJ1Gb.628396$HS4.4577961@attbi_s01>, Kevin <Kevin@el.net> > wrote: > > > How true, except for Texas. They say ,Texas law say you can shoot > > someone trespassing on your property after dark. > > No. Trespassing is not enough. > > TEXAS CONCEALED HANDGUN LAWS PC ?9.51. 49 > > PC ?9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is > justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or > tangible, movable property: > (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under > Section 9.41; and > (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly > force is immediately necessary: > (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, > robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal > mischief during the nighttime; or > (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing > burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime > from escaping with the property; and > (3) he reasonably believes that: > (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by > any other means; or > (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover > the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial > risk of death or serious bodily injury. > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ... >>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote: >> >>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX. >> >> No, it's not. > it should be... (double check but this used to be the Texas law on use of Deadly Force) "Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library -- DougW |
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ... >>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote: >> >>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX. >> >> No, it's not. > it should be... (double check but this used to be the Texas law on use of Deadly Force) "Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library -- DougW |
Re: almost stolen!
Joe did pass the time by typing:
> "Jeepers" wrote ... >>"Terry Jeffrey" wrote: >> >>> "Your honor, he deserved a killin" is a valid defense in TX. >> >> No, it's not. > it should be... (double check but this used to be the Texas law on use of Deadly Force) "Deadly force - when as above, and when he reasonably believes deadly force necessary to prevent arson, burglary, robbery, theft during nighttime, or criminal mischeif as night; or to prevent one who is fleeing from escaping with property from above.", lectlaw library -- DougW |
Re: almost stolen!
In article <sP6Gb.6794$IM3.2500@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote: > it should be... That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: almost stolen!
In article <sP6Gb.6794$IM3.2500@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote: > it should be... That's a different story. Some people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands