6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
>
> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>
>
The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
>
> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>
>
The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
>
> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>
>
The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:20031016163526.12501.00003248@mb-m04.aol.com...
> I was under the impression Ford designed and built those.
you are exactly correct. from '51 to about '79.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:44 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:44 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:44 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
<beerman@yahoo.com> shared the following:
>
>>
>> I guess I feel like this. I'm about to buy a Jeep. An older CJ. I
>> have a choice of buying one with a I6 or one with a V8 if I stick
>> factory options. The V8 puts out more power. To me, more power is a
>> good thing, that's all. I believe you guys that the I6 is very
>> capable. I know the newer 4.0 engine puts out more torque/hp than an
>> old 304. There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>> I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet. So my
>> options are the I6 or the V8. I choose the V8.
>>
>>
>
>The I6 in the year models you are looking at is a 4.2L.
I realize that. It puts out less power than the 304 available in the
same model year. Someone else mentioned the 4.0 liter, that's why I
brought it up again. Because it *does* put out more power than the
old 304s, but it's not an option that was available on the old CJs
that I'm looking at. If it *was* available on them then I'd probably
go with one of them rather than the V8. "More power is good" is just
my personal opinion.
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 6 cyl. YJ or 4 cyl. TJ?????????
In article <coDjb.242$gk.238@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>, twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> writes:
>I guess they dropped
>the suit against GM completely.
It was dismissed. But it sure got both companies a lot of free advertising.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> writes:
>I guess they dropped
>the suit against GM completely.
It was dismissed. But it sure got both companies a lot of free advertising.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
