In article <coDjb.242$gk.238@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>, twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> writes:

>I guess they dropped
>the suit against GM completely.

It was dismissed. But it sure got both companies a lot of free advertising.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <coDjb.242$gk.238@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>, twaldron
<twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> writes:

>I guess they dropped
>the suit against GM completely.

It was dismissed. But it sure got both companies a lot of free advertising.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <p60uovo4aj3ac3vfbbmsasbfqt0ivm2op0@4ax.com>, travis
<travist34removethis@hotmail.com> writes:

>There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet

There's a good reason for that, they weren't available in CJ's. The 4.0 is the
4.2 successor.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <p60uovo4aj3ac3vfbbmsasbfqt0ivm2op0@4ax.com>, travis
<travist34removethis@hotmail.com> writes:

>There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet

There's a good reason for that, they weren't available in CJ's. The 4.0 is the
4.2 successor.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <p60uovo4aj3ac3vfbbmsasbfqt0ivm2op0@4ax.com>, travis
<travist34removethis@hotmail.com> writes:

>There are going to be very few 4.0 engines in the older CJs
>I'm looking at. Actually I haven't seen a single one yet

There's a good reason for that, they weren't available in CJ's. The 4.0 is the
4.2 successor.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

Yup, pretty much like the bar bell you train with, you of course,
can lift your Ruby. I'd send you a picture of me lifting, but can't
figure out how to use the timer. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Nathan Collier wrote:
>
> actually what he did is called a deadlift, and deadlifting the *** end of an
> MB really isnt all that tough.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com

 

Yup, pretty much like the bar bell you train with, you of course,
can lift your Ruby. I'd send you a picture of me lifting, but can't
figure out how to use the timer. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Nathan Collier wrote:
>
> actually what he did is called a deadlift, and deadlifting the *** end of an
> MB really isnt all that tough.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com

 

Yup, pretty much like the bar bell you train with, you of course,
can lift your Ruby. I'd send you a picture of me lifting, but can't
figure out how to use the timer. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Nathan Collier wrote:
>
> actually what he did is called a deadlift, and deadlifting the *** end of an
> MB really isnt all that tough.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com

 

"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:p56dndISr-80nBKiRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> You're right, Nate, the MUTT is not a Jeep. The MUTT is a dangerous
attempt
> at updating the Jeep with independent suspension.

agreed. they even came out with an a2 version that the control arms pivoted
front to rear (similar to a tj control arms, except controlling IFS
components instead of a live axle) instead of side to side and added a sway
bar. while it helped a little, it was still deemed so dangerous that the
army ordered them to be cut up before disposal to prevent people from
restoring them.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com

 

"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:p56dndISr-80nBKiRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> You're right, Nate, the MUTT is not a Jeep. The MUTT is a dangerous
attempt
> at updating the Jeep with independent suspension.

agreed. they even came out with an a2 version that the control arms pivoted
front to rear (similar to a tj control arms, except controlling IFS
components instead of a live axle) instead of side to side and added a sway
bar. while it helped a little, it was still deemed so dangerous that the
army ordered them to be cut up before disposal to prevent people from
restoring them.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com