33s and 4.10s
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
> same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
Jerry
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> American Motors Corp. didn't use "C" clips:
> http://www.californiajeeper.com/axle.htm
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>No, the engineers that approved the Dana 35c were with AMC Bill, the
>>same ones that also approved the use of the French POS BA/10 transmission..
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
> weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
> shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
> c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
> if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
> It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
> shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
> option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
> Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>
> Jerry
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 33s and 4.10s
Afraid you're wrong Bill. Both the c-clip and non-clip versions are
both called Dana 35c. The "c" in Dana 35c does not, as you should have
known by now, stands for "Custom" and has nothing to do with whether or
not it is a c-clip design or not.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/axle/d35c.html
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
>>weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
>>shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
>>c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
>>if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
>>It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
>>shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
>>option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
>>Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>>
>>Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
both called Dana 35c. The "c" in Dana 35c does not, as you should have
known by now, stands for "Custom" and has nothing to do with whether or
not it is a c-clip design or not.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/axle/d35c.html
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> There is NO "C" in American Motors Corp. nomenclature.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Who mentioned c-clips? I just said it was AMC who started using the
>>weaker Dana 35c axle in the YJ Wrangler. Besides, Dana 35c axle
>>shafts held in with c-clips are no weaker than Dana 35c axles without
>>c-clips. It's just that c-clip design will let the axle shaft slide out
>>if a shaft breaks. But both have the same exact axle shaft strength.
>>It was AMC who downsized the axle to the smaller diameter Dana 35c axle
>>shafts and it was Chrysler who reintroduced the rear Dana 44 as an
>>option. AMC didn't even offer a stronger rear axle for the AMC-designed
>>Wrangler like Chrysler does with the Chrysler-Jeep designed Wrangler TJ.
>>
>>Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
