2007 Wrangler???
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Absolutely correct!!!!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Nothing is free in the world of engines....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Nothing is free in the world of engines....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Nothing is free in the world of engines....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Absolutely correct!!!!
>
> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
> in
> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
> >> And your point is?
> >>
> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >>> engine.
> >
> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
> >
> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> ----------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
high RPMs.
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:43D3A1F8.33F6718B@sympatico.ca...
> Nothing is free in the world of engines....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely correct!!!!
>>
>> "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
>> in
>> message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> > Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> >> And your point is?
>> >>
>> >> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> >>> engine.
>> >
>> > I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
>> > engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>> >
>> > At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Simon
>> > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
A high horsepower cam will always have more torque, just at a
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
A high horsepower cam will always have more torque, just at a
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
A high horsepower cam will always have more torque, just at a
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
higher RPMs. A thirty, thirty degree cam may lose that good idle below a
grand, though. Where you have to goose it to clean it out, which is not
a good quality when rock crawling, BUT one Hell of an ego booster when
you're King of the Hill: http://www.----------.com/pismo.htm Typical
torque cures between stock and performance cams:
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...0/graph-SC.gif
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> ange the camshaft to get more low-end torque and you lose it at
> high RPMs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepadmin
Jeep News
0
11-04-2007 06:38 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)