2007 Wrangler???
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
I can't wait to drop it in the California's State Park Anza
Borrego's Pinyon Mountain Trail to Split Mountain ravine. :-)
http://www.sd4wheel.com/Past_Events/STPATMAR02.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> The track ("stance") is 3 1/2" wider (!), and the wheelbase is 2" longer.
Borrego's Pinyon Mountain Trail to Split Mountain ravine. :-)
http://www.sd4wheel.com/Past_Events/STPATMAR02.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> The track ("stance") is 3 1/2" wider (!), and the wheelbase is 2" longer.
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
I can't wait to drop it in the California's State Park Anza
Borrego's Pinyon Mountain Trail to Split Mountain ravine. :-)
http://www.sd4wheel.com/Past_Events/STPATMAR02.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> The track ("stance") is 3 1/2" wider (!), and the wheelbase is 2" longer.
Borrego's Pinyon Mountain Trail to Split Mountain ravine. :-)
http://www.sd4wheel.com/Past_Events/STPATMAR02.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
> The track ("stance") is 3 1/2" wider (!), and the wheelbase is 2" longer.
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Jerry Bransford wrote:
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Jerry Bransford wrote:
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Jerry Bransford wrote:
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
> And your point is?
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>> engine.
I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Just off the top of my head, the I6 has a longer stroke and greater rotating
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Just off the top of my head, the I6 has a longer stroke and greater rotating
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Just off the top of my head, the I6 has a longer stroke and greater rotating
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
mass, which makes it "torquey". You can't duplicate that by swapping in a
cam.
Earle
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
> > And your point is?
> >
> > jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
> >> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Absolutely correct!!!!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Absolutely correct!!!!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote
in
message news:euSdnVQtT_xsGk7enZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> A change in camshafts can DRASTICALLY change the torque curve of ANY
>>> engine.
>
> I suspect he's trying to hint that swaping out a Cam can make other
> engines -- which may be much more desirable all around; low torquers.
>
> At least *I think* that's what he's getting at :)
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 595 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!