2007 Wrangler???
01-20-2006, 07:34 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
If you want to buy me one, there is a place in Denver I can take it to get
dyno'ed. ;^)
Earle
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> > It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
It
> > has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
has
> > seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> >
> >>Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read
> >>up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous
> >>Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated
front
> >>antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to
the
> >>level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> >>lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> >>offroad IFS that so many feared.
> >>
> >>jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>>There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
formed
> >>>any opinions yet??
> >>
> >>--
> >>Jerry Bransford
> >>PP-ASEL N6TAY
> >>See the Geezer Jeep at
> >>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
dyno'ed. ;^)
Earle
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> > It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
It
> > has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
has
> > seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> >
> >>Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read
> >>up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous
> >>Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated
front
> >>antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to
the
> >>level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> >>lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> >>offroad IFS that so many feared.
> >>
> >>jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>>There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
formed
> >>>any opinions yet??
> >>
> >>--
> >>Jerry Bransford
> >>PP-ASEL N6TAY
> >>See the Geezer Jeep at
> >>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 07:34 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
If you want to buy me one, there is a place in Denver I can take it to get
dyno'ed. ;^)
Earle
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> > It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
It
> > has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
has
> > seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> >
> >>Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read
> >>up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous
> >>Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated
front
> >>antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to
the
> >>level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> >>lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> >>offroad IFS that so many feared.
> >>
> >>jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>>There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
formed
> >>>any opinions yet??
> >>
> >>--
> >>Jerry Bransford
> >>PP-ASEL N6TAY
> >>See the Geezer Jeep at
> >>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
dyno'ed. ;^)
Earle
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> > It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
It
> > has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
has
> > seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> >
> >>Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read
> >>up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous
> >>Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated
front
> >>antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to
the
> >>level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> >>lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> >>offroad IFS that so many feared.
> >>
> >>jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>>There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
formed
> >>>any opinions yet??
> >>
> >>--
> >>Jerry Bransford
> >>PP-ASEL N6TAY
> >>See the Geezer Jeep at
> >>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 08:42 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Does anybody here have a website address that has a "torque curve" chart for
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
01-20-2006, 08:42 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Does anybody here have a website address that has a "torque curve" chart for
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
01-20-2006, 08:42 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Does anybody here have a website address that has a "torque curve" chart for
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
the I-6?
Tom
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:DOeAf.15002$V.14174@fed1read04...
> The new V6 has more torque & HP at higher RPMs but at low RPMs where it
> counts on the trail, the I6 still delivers more torque. Jeep has been
> very careful to not show the torque curve of that engine in quite some
> time to avoid easy comparisons.
>
snip
01-20-2006, 09:28 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
is it the same 3.8 that has been in the minivan?
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
01-20-2006, 09:28 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
is it the same 3.8 that has been in the minivan?
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
01-20-2006, 09:28 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
is it the same 3.8 that has been in the minivan?
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
Here's a link to atorque curve from the 2002 3.8 I found:
http://www.geocities.com/namastefolks/powercurves.jpg
Chad
04 LJ 3" BDS 33's etc...
01-20-2006, 10:08 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Yep, my wife's 04 WJ was the last year for the I-6 too and she bought it
becaues of the I-6, Tried and True.
Coasty
"Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bO6dnT09Sco7HUzenZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It might be old, but it's tried and true and has never let me down.
>
> Carl
>
>
> <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
>> It has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
>> has seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
>>> read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>>
>>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
>>>> formed any opinions yet??
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Bransford
>>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>>
>>
>
>
becaues of the I-6, Tried and True.
Coasty
"Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bO6dnT09Sco7HUzenZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It might be old, but it's tried and true and has never let me down.
>
> Carl
>
>
> <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
>> It has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
>> has seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
>>> read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>>
>>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
>>>> formed any opinions yet??
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Bransford
>>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>>
>>
>
>
01-20-2006, 10:08 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Yep, my wife's 04 WJ was the last year for the I-6 too and she bought it
becaues of the I-6, Tried and True.
Coasty
"Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bO6dnT09Sco7HUzenZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It might be old, but it's tried and true and has never let me down.
>
> Carl
>
>
> <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
>> It has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
>> has seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
>>> read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>>
>>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
>>>> formed any opinions yet??
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Bransford
>>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>>
>>
>
>
becaues of the I-6, Tried and True.
Coasty
"Carl" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bO6dnT09Sco7HUzenZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It might be old, but it's tried and true and has never let me down.
>
> Carl
>
>
> <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it.
>> It has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which
>> has seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
>>> read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>>
>>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone
>>>> formed any opinions yet??
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Bransford
>>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>>
>>
>
>
