2007 Wrangler???
01-20-2006, 04:56 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 04:56 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 04:56 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
read up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed any
> opinions yet??
>
>
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 05:38 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 05:38 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 05:38 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any previous
> Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically actuated front
> antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years to get it to the
> level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It could have been a
> lot worse, it could have had the better riding but worse performing
> offroad IFS that so many feared.
>
> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>> any opinions yet??
>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
01-20-2006, 06:39 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only time will tell the I-6 is pretty much bullet proof and many have 200k
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
01-20-2006, 06:39 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only time will tell the I-6 is pretty much bullet proof and many have 200k
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
01-20-2006, 06:39 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2007 Wrangler???
Only time will tell the I-6 is pretty much bullet proof and many have 200k
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
or more with out any rebuilds. I am just glad I got mine.
Coasty
<jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HdKdndsXBdjI-0zeRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> It sounds terrific to me. And don't count out the V-6 unitl you try it. It
> has MORE TORQUE and horsepower than the old, inefficient AMC I-6 which has
> seen better days. (I'm running for cover now!!!)
>
>
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:8_cAf.14992$V.2127@fed1read04...
>> Only one or two minor dislikes like the new V6 engine. However, I've read
>> up on it pretty thoroughly and it's every bit the Wrangler as any
>> previous Wrangler was. Lots of improvments like the electronically
>> actuated front antiswaybar. If it wouldn't take me the same nine years
>> to get it to the level of my current Wrangler, I'd spring for one. It
>> could have been a lot worse, it could have had the better riding but
>> worse performing offroad IFS that so many feared.
>>
>> jcarter10@comcast.net wrote:
>>> There's plenty of information on Jeep.com about it. So has anyone formed
>>> any opinions yet??
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Bransford
>> PP-ASEL N6TAY
>> See the Geezer Jeep at
>> http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
