2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Lon,
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Oops, the new Hemi 5.7 remains the trouble free pushrod design:
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Oops, the new Hemi 5.7 remains the trouble free pushrod design:
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Oops, the new Hemi 5.7 remains the trouble free pushrod design:
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Oops, the new Hemi 5.7 remains the trouble free pushrod design:
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/57hemi/...mi_cutaway.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
ah, thanks, Bill.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4100CB5B.1CE96D9C@***.net...
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > why's that Lon ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4100CB5B.1CE96D9C@***.net...
> Hi Dave,
> Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
> hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
> angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
> it though, it'll just never develop the horse power like the engines
> from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > why's that Lon ?