134a Refrigerant
#711
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chlorofluorocarbons, have been against the law to produce for over
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
#712
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chlorofluorocarbons, have been against the law to produce for over
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
#713
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Chlorofluorocarbons, have been against the law to produce for over
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
ten years, get over it!
And pray the Sun doesn't shot another solar flare in our direction:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> The word 'ozone' does not appear on that page...
> neither do the words 'CFC, flouro-, chloro'...
> you're just posting the first thing Google gives
> you, like that crystal mysticism link. Find some
> more of that crap, that was funny!
>
> I hear about *every* 'burp' the sun makes... I'm a ham,
> remember?
>
> The more you try to spin, the more stupid you look...
>
> Read this some more:
>
> <>
> Myth: The Antarctic ozone "hole" was there all along, it was discovered in
> the 1970's because that's when satellite measurements started.
> Fact: The hole was discovered using a ground based instrument that had been
> in use since 1956. There was no hole until about 1976. That means about 20
> years with no hole. Since the 70s the hole has continued to increase in size
> and intensity (Farman, et al, Jones & Shanklin).
> Myth: The "hole" was present when the first measurements were made in 1956.
> Fact: The first ozone measurements made in the Antarctic were lower than
> similar measurements made in the Arctic. However, this is the natural
> condition, not the decrease that is referred to as the ozone "hole". As
> noted above, there was no "hole" during the first 20 or so years of
> measurement. (Parson, Christie).
> Myth: Some French researchers found an ozone hole in 1958.
> Fact: Paul A. Newman (Newman) looked at all the facts and found that "There
> is no credible evidence for an ozone hole in 1958."
> </>
> __
> Steve
> .
#714
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Congratulations, I was young and stupid once myself:
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
#715
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Congratulations, I was young and stupid once myself:
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
#716
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Congratulations, I was young and stupid once myself:
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
#717
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Congratulations, I was young and stupid once myself:
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
http://www.----------.com/stevDegree.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> It should be in your inbox now, as a .tiff inside a .zip.
> Let me know if you can't open it.... let everyone here
> know that you received it, and that it appears genuine.
> __
> Steve
> BS, with no bs
> .
#718
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Typical bleeding heart liberal, when confronted with facts, resort
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .
#719
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Typical bleeding heart liberal, when confronted with facts, resort
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .
#720
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Typical bleeding heart liberal, when confronted with facts, resort
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .
to name calling.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
>
> __
> Steve
> .