134a Refrigerant
#4021
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdmqgghdsm79@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:d1hHe.272$LE2.151@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > See... I'm right. Took me long enough to
> > draw him out... looks like your refrigeration
> > education is incomplete, Nate... stop by
> > the VLA in New Mexico for some lessons.
> > Tell Rudy I said hi.
>
> lol youre a stupid ***. i work to make money and im doing both quite
well.
> :-) not a lot of cryo to worry about in montana.
Well then... were you just forgetting, or
were you lying, when you wrote:
>the only area i dont consider myself qualified on yet is ground
>source/geo thermal.
???
__
Steve
..
#4022
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdboc5bbemb7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0OgHe.266$LE2.77@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> >> TRANSLATION --> "i never let facts get in the way of my story"
> >
> > Obviously!
>
> yes, it is quite evident/obvious that you never let facts get in the way
of
> your lies.
Spinning Nate, got to go 'round... we all
read the challenge. I met the challenge,
all original specific criteria met, and won.
You welched... you suck, we all know
that now (if we didn't have a clue before).
> > The pot is calling the toaster black.
>
> nope, just calling a liar a liar.
You're just daubing the walls of your
chimp cage, Nate... we all read what
you wrote. Remember what brought
me into this incredibly long, stupid
thread? You pronounced decades
of atmospheric science as junk... you
even claimed that if someone could
show you the mechanism or connection
that you'd change your tune. Suprise,
suprise! your tune didn't change...
a big lie. Then you made your biggest
error... claiming to 'recognize and own'
your limitations. Complete and utter
crap... this is what I wrote in response
to that whopping lie:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
It's very important to 'own your limitations', Nate...
and 'immediately' would not be soon enough for me.
__
Steve
..
#4023
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdboc5bbemb7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0OgHe.266$LE2.77@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> >> TRANSLATION --> "i never let facts get in the way of my story"
> >
> > Obviously!
>
> yes, it is quite evident/obvious that you never let facts get in the way
of
> your lies.
Spinning Nate, got to go 'round... we all
read the challenge. I met the challenge,
all original specific criteria met, and won.
You welched... you suck, we all know
that now (if we didn't have a clue before).
> > The pot is calling the toaster black.
>
> nope, just calling a liar a liar.
You're just daubing the walls of your
chimp cage, Nate... we all read what
you wrote. Remember what brought
me into this incredibly long, stupid
thread? You pronounced decades
of atmospheric science as junk... you
even claimed that if someone could
show you the mechanism or connection
that you'd change your tune. Suprise,
suprise! your tune didn't change...
a big lie. Then you made your biggest
error... claiming to 'recognize and own'
your limitations. Complete and utter
crap... this is what I wrote in response
to that whopping lie:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
It's very important to 'own your limitations', Nate...
and 'immediately' would not be soon enough for me.
__
Steve
..
#4024
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdboc5bbemb7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0OgHe.266$LE2.77@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> >> TRANSLATION --> "i never let facts get in the way of my story"
> >
> > Obviously!
>
> yes, it is quite evident/obvious that you never let facts get in the way
of
> your lies.
Spinning Nate, got to go 'round... we all
read the challenge. I met the challenge,
all original specific criteria met, and won.
You welched... you suck, we all know
that now (if we didn't have a clue before).
> > The pot is calling the toaster black.
>
> nope, just calling a liar a liar.
You're just daubing the walls of your
chimp cage, Nate... we all read what
you wrote. Remember what brought
me into this incredibly long, stupid
thread? You pronounced decades
of atmospheric science as junk... you
even claimed that if someone could
show you the mechanism or connection
that you'd change your tune. Suprise,
suprise! your tune didn't change...
a big lie. Then you made your biggest
error... claiming to 'recognize and own'
your limitations. Complete and utter
crap... this is what I wrote in response
to that whopping lie:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
It's very important to 'own your limitations', Nate...
and 'immediately' would not be soon enough for me.
__
Steve
..
#4025
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdboc5bbemb7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0OgHe.266$LE2.77@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> >> TRANSLATION --> "i never let facts get in the way of my story"
> >
> > Obviously!
>
> yes, it is quite evident/obvious that you never let facts get in the way
of
> your lies.
Spinning Nate, got to go 'round... we all
read the challenge. I met the challenge,
all original specific criteria met, and won.
You welched... you suck, we all know
that now (if we didn't have a clue before).
> > The pot is calling the toaster black.
>
> nope, just calling a liar a liar.
You're just daubing the walls of your
chimp cage, Nate... we all read what
you wrote. Remember what brought
me into this incredibly long, stupid
thread? You pronounced decades
of atmospheric science as junk... you
even claimed that if someone could
show you the mechanism or connection
that you'd change your tune. Suprise,
suprise! your tune didn't change...
a big lie. Then you made your biggest
error... claiming to 'recognize and own'
your limitations. Complete and utter
crap... this is what I wrote in response
to that whopping lie:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
It's very important to 'own your limitations', Nate...
and 'immediately' would not be soon enough for me.
__
Steve
..
#4026
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdit4thq73e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:vPgHe.268$LE2.13@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > You deserve what you get... remember that.
>
> exactly. i grossed over a grand today alone. what did you do, loser?
:-)
Do you mean what did I "do", or what did I "earn"?
And which day, exactly, are you referring to?
__
Steve
..
trophy .sig:
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it."... Nate.
#4027
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdit4thq73e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:vPgHe.268$LE2.13@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > You deserve what you get... remember that.
>
> exactly. i grossed over a grand today alone. what did you do, loser?
:-)
Do you mean what did I "do", or what did I "earn"?
And which day, exactly, are you referring to?
__
Steve
..
trophy .sig:
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it."... Nate.
#4028
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdit4thq73e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:vPgHe.268$LE2.13@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > You deserve what you get... remember that.
>
> exactly. i grossed over a grand today alone. what did you do, loser?
:-)
Do you mean what did I "do", or what did I "earn"?
And which day, exactly, are you referring to?
__
Steve
..
trophy .sig:
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it."... Nate.
#4029
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11erdit4thq73e0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:vPgHe.268$LE2.13@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > You deserve what you get... remember that.
>
> exactly. i grossed over a grand today alone. what did you do, loser?
:-)
Do you mean what did I "do", or what did I "earn"?
And which day, exactly, are you referring to?
__
Steve
..
trophy .sig:
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it."... Nate.
#4030
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42EDABB9.5CFBB3C9@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Are you trying to frighten small children with that pic?
> > It doesn't impress me....
> >
> > Ok, here's an easy one for you... I did this one for
> > extra credit in a college calc class. Explain (without
> > your buddy Google) how the volume of liquid in
> > a cylindrical tank on its side is computed, using only a
> > dipstick marked in inches from a hole in the top...
> > just like you did every day when you read the pumps.
> > Only this time, you don't get a chart... all you get is
> > the radius and length of the cylinder. No cheating!
> > Explain in words, with minimal equations.
> I've got better things to do than work a problem that has nothing
> to do with chlorofluorocarbons. I can tell you the answer contains
> infinity, as there is not one known other than a depth in inches.
Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
written like it was.
Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
means that you know the half-volume from a simple
(pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
circle times the length.
One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
solutions... once you have the general solution,
the rest of the examples are simply grinding
through the equations. Here we seek the general
solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
"I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
through it like corn through a goose.
__
Steve
..