134a Refrigerant
#3021
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Sometimes we have to trick some of these jerks into looking up a
word, so maybe they will learn something and stop just being bleeding
heart liberal sucking off our society's tax payers.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
thomas wrote:
>
> jeff wrote:
>
> > (SNIP) and induced dipole-dipole attraction.
> >
>
> HEY NOW!! This is family channel!!
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
word, so maybe they will learn something and stop just being bleeding
heart liberal sucking off our society's tax payers.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
thomas wrote:
>
> jeff wrote:
>
> > (SNIP) and induced dipole-dipole attraction.
> >
>
> HEY NOW!! This is family channel!!
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
#3022
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
#3023
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
#3024
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
#3025
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
"density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
single phase solution is still my answer.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Geez Jeff, make a simple search of internet before you make another
> stupid statement:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
> "Or tell them "Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
> density"
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Were you born this stupid, or did you have to take lessons at it later
>>in life???? Miscibility of water and alcohol has nothing to do with
>>"density" and likewise nothing to do with molecule size. BTW, three
>>component phase diagrams are pretty cool things with some nice saddles
>>and inflections where the miscibility gaps are. This miscibility gap is
>>why there is only a certain amount of water that can be absorbed by dry
>>gas, even though alcohol and gasoline are fully miscible, and water and
>>alcohol are fully miscible.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
#3026
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff????????????
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
#3027
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff????????????
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
#3028
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff????????????
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
#3029
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Jeff????????????
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
Again the smaller volume was formed by density as this site calls
it, as when condensation forms a drop of water from hydrogen and oxygen:
http://www.nima.co.uk/basics/basics1.htm "density ~1000 times that of
the gas phase."
Can you find the word "denser" in the deification of "condensation"
used commonly to describe a mixing change, usually via temperature
change.
Pronunciation: "kän-"den-'sA-sh&n, -d&n-
Function: noun
1 : the act or process of condensing : as a : a chemical
reaction involving union between molecules often with
elimination of a simple molecule (as water) to form a new
more complex compound of often greater molecular weight b :
the conversion of a substance (as water) from the vapor state
to a denser liquid or solid state usually initiated by a reduction
in temperature of the vapor c : compression of a written or
spoken work into more concise form
Maybe, this is some Freudian thing you have with the word dense?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
jeff wrote:
>
> Bill: the only one making stupid statements here is you. The original
> question was why does a mixture water and alcohol occupy less volume
> than the sum of the original two volumes. Your one word answer was
> "density". By definition, if it has less volume it has a greater
> specific gravity, or "density", but this does not answer the question
> which was *WHY*. BillyRay's answer about molecules fitting together
> closer is correct as far as it goes, but that does not address the why
> or how of this closer packing. Miscibility, or the ability to form a
> single phase solution is still my answer.
>
> --
> jeff
#3030
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Bill,
Sometimes you say things that just don't make sense. "Bleeding heart
liberals" are some of the country's biggest tax payers. I would be paying
taxes too, if the stock market hadn't gone in the tank, coincidentally with
GWB's election.
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42D56B34.C486D498@***.net...
> Sometimes we have to trick some of these jerks into looking up a
> word, so maybe they will learn something and stop just being bleeding
> heart liberal sucking off our society's tax payers.
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...dipole-dipole+
attraction%22&btnG=Google+Search
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> thomas wrote:
> >
> > jeff wrote:
> >
> > > (SNIP) and induced dipole-dipole attraction.
> > >
> >
> > HEY NOW!! This is family channel!!
> >
> > --
> > __________________________________________________ _________
> > tw
> >
> > 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> > 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> > 01 XJ Sport
> >
> > There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> > -- Dave Barry
> >
> > Pronunciation: 'jEp
> > Function: noun
> > Date: 1940
> >
> > Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> > A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> > 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> > World War II.
> >
> > (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> > __________________________________________________ _________
Sometimes you say things that just don't make sense. "Bleeding heart
liberals" are some of the country's biggest tax payers. I would be paying
taxes too, if the stock market hadn't gone in the tank, coincidentally with
GWB's election.
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42D56B34.C486D498@***.net...
> Sometimes we have to trick some of these jerks into looking up a
> word, so maybe they will learn something and stop just being bleeding
> heart liberal sucking off our society's tax payers.
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...dipole-dipole+
attraction%22&btnG=Google+Search
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> thomas wrote:
> >
> > jeff wrote:
> >
> > > (SNIP) and induced dipole-dipole attraction.
> > >
> >
> > HEY NOW!! This is family channel!!
> >
> > --
> > __________________________________________________ _________
> > tw
> >
> > 71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> > 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> > 01 XJ Sport
> >
> > There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> > -- Dave Barry
> >
> > Pronunciation: 'jEp
> > Function: noun
> > Date: 1940
> >
> > Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> > A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> > 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> > World War II.
> >
> > (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> > __________________________________________________ _________