134a Refrigerant
#4051
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4052
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4053
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> You challenged Jeff
> to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> going to get low.
LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are a
LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to see
your lie.
> in fact was not part of the original challenge
see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and it
was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
> you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling eyes>
youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
pathetic life.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#4054
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Volume is measured in cubes, not squares, idiot!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
#4055
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Volume is measured in cubes, not squares, idiot!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
#4056
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Volume is measured in cubes, not squares, idiot!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
#4057
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Volume is measured in cubes, not squares, idiot!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Damn! that's funny! You found a sideways 8 in a simple
> volume calculation! How many times have you stuck the
> tanks and read the pumps? Tens of thousands? And never
> once (even with your advanced mathematics knowlege)
> did you ever get curious about why that tank chart was
> written like it was.
>
> Here's the first clue... the halfway point of the volume
> is the same, either standing up or laying down. This
> means that you know the half-volume from a simple
> (pi*(r^2)*L)/2 equation. That's half the area of the end
> circle times the length.
>
> One of the big things your math teacher couldn't
> get you to realize... in math, we seek *general*
> solutions... once you have the general solution,
> the rest of the examples are simply grinding
> through the equations. Here we seek the general
> solution to the volume of liquid in a partially-filled
> cylindrical tank, on its side... something you have
> had to do literally thousands of times in your life.
> Yet you have no clue... and continue to claim
> "I've gone through Calculus". If so, you went
> through it like corn through a goose.
> __
> Steve
> .
#4058
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11esij9705ajg64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You challenged Jeff
> > to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> > you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> > going to get low.
>
> LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
> TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are
a
> LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to
see
> your lie.
Watch him squeal! We all read it... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
notice you didn't say that the challenge rules defined -30,
you were giving an example of 'in a pinch'. In fact, I believe
you're in a pinch now! You in no way defined a new challenge.
> > in fact was not part of the original challenge
>
> see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and
it
> was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
way defined the exact terms of the challenge, and I can
think of several scenarios where you'd need to replace
the valve but the ambient was high. I also refer you to
the original challenge, where you had no such condition...
why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me...
> > you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
>
> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
eyes>
Logical fallacies... means your brain no workie too good.
Could be causing that eye rolling! See a doctor!
> youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
> pathetic life.
Keep squealing... makes me feel like I've accomplished
something here.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Limitations! Own them! Or lie about it... welch.
__
Steve
..
#4059
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11esij9705ajg64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You challenged Jeff
> > to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> > you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> > going to get low.
>
> LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
> TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are
a
> LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to
see
> your lie.
Watch him squeal! We all read it... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
notice you didn't say that the challenge rules defined -30,
you were giving an example of 'in a pinch'. In fact, I believe
you're in a pinch now! You in no way defined a new challenge.
> > in fact was not part of the original challenge
>
> see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and
it
> was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
way defined the exact terms of the challenge, and I can
think of several scenarios where you'd need to replace
the valve but the ambient was high. I also refer you to
the original challenge, where you had no such condition...
why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me...
> > you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
>
> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
eyes>
Logical fallacies... means your brain no workie too good.
Could be causing that eye rolling! See a doctor!
> youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
> pathetic life.
Keep squealing... makes me feel like I've accomplished
something here.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Limitations! Own them! Or lie about it... welch.
__
Steve
..
#4060
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11esij9705ajg64@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:91qHe.1143$5q7.78@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > You challenged Jeff
> > to find a replacement for a head pressure control... I said
> > you could just bypass the control if the ambient wasn't
> > going to get low.
>
> LIAR! you didnt say _anything_ until well AFTER i CLEARLY stated directly
> TO YOU that the ambient was -30 and ive linked to it many times. you are
a
> LIAR. news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com its right there for all to
see
> your lie.
Watch him squeal! We all read it... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
notice you didn't say that the challenge rules defined -30,
you were giving an example of 'in a pinch'. In fact, I believe
you're in a pinch now! You in no way defined a new challenge.
> > in fact was not part of the original challenge
>
> see above link. it was INDEED part of the original challenge TO YOU and
it
> was given to you long before your pitiful google. :-)
No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
way defined the exact terms of the challenge, and I can
think of several scenarios where you'd need to replace
the valve but the ambient was high. I also refer you to
the original challenge, where you had no such condition...
why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me...
> > you refer to the 'credibility' of my links.
>
> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
eyes>
Logical fallacies... means your brain no workie too good.
Could be causing that eye rolling! See a doctor!
> youre a liar.....and id just bet youve been hearing that your entire
> pathetic life.
Keep squealing... makes me feel like I've accomplished
something here.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Limitations! Own them! Or lie about it... welch.
__
Steve
..